10x More Selective (2013)
The article discusses the concept of '10x programmers' who are believed to be significantly more productive than their peers. It argues that this productivity is not solely due to higher aptitude or knowledge, but rather a greater selectivity in the work they choose to undertake. The author shares personal experiences to illustrate the importance of avoiding unproductive tasks and focusing on more impactful work.
- ▪The notion of '10x programmers' suggests that some individuals are ten times more productive than average programmers.
- ▪The author believes that selectivity in choosing work is more crucial than just having higher aptitude or knowledge.
- ▪Personal anecdotes highlight the pitfalls of engaging in unproductive work and the importance of focusing on tasks that yield meaningful results.
Hacker News (Newest) files mainly under programming. We currently carry 5,306 of its stories.
Story provenance
Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record
inspect →
Story provenance
Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.
Record
| Original publisher | Yosefk |
| Canonical URL | https://yosefk.com/blog/10x-more-selective.html |
| Publication time | Tue, 19 May 2026 08:11:43 +0000 |
| Retrieval time | 2026-05-19T08:34:57.460Z |
| Last seen | 2026-05-19T08:34:57.460Z |
| Headline source | Publisher (no WeSearch rewrite) |
| Excerpt source | publisher body |
| Excerpt method | First ~120 words (~800 chars) of extracted publisher body, fair-use limited. |
| Summary | WeSearch · cerebras-chat (WeSearch summarizer) |
| Summary source text | contentText |
| Citation coverage | Summary is a WeSearch-generated derivative; primary citation is the original publisher URL. |
| Cluster | qX2m8G24WS8I |
| Cluster logic | Grouped by semantic title/content similarity across sources within a rolling window. Same-publisher template collisions are excluded from coverage comparison. |
| Ranking reason | Story pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking. |
| Publisher visit | Yes — open original |
| Substitutes article? | No — link-out required for full text |
Rights status (four layers)
WeSearch handling by dimension
| Indexing | May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)? | Allowed |
| Snippet | May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown? | Allowed |
| AI summary | May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article? | Limited |
| Retrieval / RAG | May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation? | Not asserted |
| Model training | May the content be used to train AI models? | Not asserted |
| Commercial reuse | May the content be reused commercially? | Not permitted |
Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
There's this common notion of "10x programmers" who are 10x more productive than the average programmer. We can't quantify productivity so we don't know if it's true. But definitely, enough people appear unusually productive to sustain the "10x programmer" notion. How do they do it? People often assume that 10x more productivity results from 10x more aptitude or 10x more knowledge. I don't think so. Now I'm not saying aptitude and knowledge don't help. But what I've noticed over the years is that the number one factor is 10x more selectivity. The trick is to consistently avoid shit work. And by shit work, I don't necessarily mean "intellectually unrewarding". Rather, the definition of shit work is that its output goes down the toilet.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at Yosefk.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from Yosefk
