AI, hackers, and prediction markets threaten the indie web
Its hand-researched data is the highest quality, tracking box office grosses, budgets, home video and streaming across more than 78,000 films and 236,000 people. The site was down for over a week, without explanation. A week later, it resurfaced at a fraction of its former size.
- ▪Its hand-researched data is the highest quality, tracking box office grosses, budgets, home video and streaming across more than 78,000 films and 236,000 people.
- ▪The site was down for over a week, without explanation.
- ▪A week later, it resurfaced at a fraction of its former size.
Hacker News (AI / LLM) files mainly under ai. We currently carry 3,327 of its stories.
Story provenance
Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record
inspect →
Story provenance
Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.
Record
| Original publisher | Stephenfollows |
| Canonical URL | https://stephenfollows.com/p/what-just-happened-to-thenumberscom-should-worry-us-all |
| Publication time | Thu, 23 Jul 2026 04:41:48 +0000 |
| Retrieval time | 2026-07-23T04:57:25.000Z |
| Last seen | 2026-07-23T04:57:25.000Z |
| Headline source | Publisher (no WeSearch rewrite) |
| Excerpt source | publisher body |
| Excerpt method | First ~120 words (~800 chars) of extracted publisher body, fair-use limited. |
| Summary | WeSearch · cerebras-chat (WeSearch summarizer) |
| Summary source text | contentText |
| Citation coverage | Summary is a WeSearch-generated derivative; primary citation is the original publisher URL. |
| Cluster | i0afxYynu3MN |
| Cluster logic | Grouped by semantic title/content similarity across sources within a rolling window. Same-publisher template collisions are excluded from coverage comparison. |
| Ranking reason | Story pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking. |
| Publisher visit | Yes — open original |
| Substitutes article? | No — link-out required for full text |
Rights status (four layers)
WeSearch handling by dimension
| Indexing | May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)? | Allowed |
| Snippet | May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown? | Allowed |
| AI summary | May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article? | Limited |
| Retrieval / RAG | May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation? | Not asserted |
| Model training | May the content be used to train AI models? | Not asserted |
| Commercial reuse | May the content be reused commercially? | Not permitted |
Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
What just happened to TheNumbers.com should worry us allThe inside story of how one of film data's most trusted sites vanished overnight, and why every website you rely on is more fragile than you think.Stephen FollowsJul 22, 20261251139ShareIf you work in or around the film industry, there is a decent chance you have used the work of The Numbers this month, whether you realise it or not. Its hand-researched data is the highest quality, tracking box office grosses, budgets, home video and streaming across more than 78,000 films and 236,000 people.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at Stephenfollows.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from Stephenfollows
