ArXiv to Ban Researchers for a Year If They Submit AI Slop
ArXiv will impose a one-year ban on researchers who submit AI-generated content without proper oversight. The policy targets submissions with clear signs of unreviewed AI output, such as hallucinated references or meta-comments from large language models. Authors must then have future work accepted by a peer-reviewed venue before resubmitting to ArXiv.
- ▪ArXiv will ban authors for one year if they submit work with clear evidence of unchecked AI generation.
- ▪Incontrovertible evidence includes hallucinated references and meta-comments left in by large language models.
- ▪Thomas Dietterich, chair of the computer science section at ArXiv, announced the policy on X.
- ▪The ban is followed by a requirement that future submissions be accepted at reputable peer-reviewed venues first.
- ▪Examples of problematic content include inappropriate language, plagiarism, bias, errors, and incorrect references generated by AI.
3 outlets in our directory ran this story, first to last over 6 hours. All of the coverage we found sits in one bucket: centre. That one-sidedness is itself worth noticing.
Hacker News (AI / LLM) files mainly under ai. We currently carry 3,344 of its stories.
Story provenance
Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record
inspect →
Story provenance
Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.
Record
| Original publisher | 404 Media |
| Canonical URL | https://www.404media.co/new-arxiv-rules-ai-generated-papers-ban/ |
| Publication time | Sat, 16 May 2026 12:49:52 +0000 |
| Retrieval time | 2026-05-16T13:00:18.528Z |
| Last seen | 2026-05-16T13:00:18.528Z |
| Headline source | Publisher (no WeSearch rewrite) |
| Excerpt source | publisher body |
| Excerpt method | First ~120 words (~800 chars) of extracted publisher body, fair-use limited. |
| Summary | WeSearch · cerebras-chat (WeSearch summarizer) |
| Summary source text | contentText |
| Citation coverage | Summary is a WeSearch-generated derivative; primary citation is the original publisher URL. |
| Cluster | s6Ck6LxCZ6gL · 3 stories |
| Cluster logic | Grouped by semantic title/content similarity across sources within a rolling window. Same-publisher template collisions are excluded from coverage comparison. |
| Ranking reason | Story pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking. |
| Publisher visit | Yes — open original |
| Substitutes article? | No — link-out required for full text |
Rights status (four layers)
WeSearch handling by dimension
| Indexing | May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)? | Allowed |
| Snippet | May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown? | Allowed |
| AI summary | May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article? | Limited |
| Retrieval / RAG | May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation? | Not asserted |
| Model training | May the content be used to train AI models? | Not asserted |
| Commercial reuse | May the content be reused commercially? | Not permitted |
Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
ArXiv, the open-access repository of preprint academic research, will ban authors of papers for a year if they submit obviously AI-generated work. Late Thursday evening, Thomas Dietterich, chair of the computer science section of ArXiv, wrote on X: “If generative AI tools generate inappropriate language, plagiarized content, biased content, errors, mistakes, incorrect references, or misleading content, and that output is included in scientific works, it is the responsibility of the author(s). We have recently clarified our penalties for this.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at 404 Media.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from 404 Media
