WeSearch

Authors face backlash for participation in 2022 Google AI study

Max Miller· ·6 min read · 0 reactions · 0 comments · 5 views
Authors face backlash for participation in 2022 Google AI study
TL;DR · WeSearch summary

News AI Authors face backlash for participation in 2022 Google AI study The 'Shameful 13' include speculative fiction luminaries Ken Liu and Robin Sloan. 11, 2026 2:24 pm EST josefkubes/Shutterstock In the spring of 2022, Google began reaching out to a series of writers, including award-winning science-fiction authors and New York Times bestsellers, for feedback on an experimental writing tool. Four years later, their participation has corners of the literary world up in arms.

Key facts
About this source

Engadget files mainly under tech. We currently carry 606 of its stories.

Original article
Engadget · Max Miller
Read full at Engadget →

Story provenance

Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record
inspect →

Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.

Record

Original publisherEngadget
Canonical URLhttps://www.engadget.com/2234838/authors-face-backlash-for-participation-in-2022-google-ai-study/
Publication timeTue, 11 Aug 2026 18:24:38 +0000
Retrieval time2026-08-11T18:30:47.867Z
Last seen2026-08-11T18:30:47.867Z
Headline sourcePublisher (no WeSearch rewrite)
Excerpt sourcepublisher body
Excerpt methodFirst ~120 words (~800 chars) of extracted publisher body, fair-use limited.
SummaryWeSearch · cerebras-chat (WeSearch summarizer)
Summary source textcontentText
Citation coverageSummary is a WeSearch-generated derivative; primary citation is the original publisher URL.
Clusterft7PmMPHv7rQ · 1 stories
Cluster logicGrouped by semantic title/content similarity across sources within a rolling window. Same-publisher template collisions are excluded from coverage comparison.
Ranking reasonStory pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking.
Publisher visitYes — open original
Substitutes article?No — link-out required for full text

Rights status (four layers)

Publisher-declared
No publisher-confirmed rights record for this source yet.
Machine-readable
No source-specific machine-readable restriction detected beyond the public feed.
WeSearch interpretation
WeSearch declared handling (basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed). This is WeSearch policy, not a legal grant on the publisher's behalf.
Unknown
Retrieval and training permissions are not asserted unless the publisher confirms them.

WeSearch handling by dimension

Indexing May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)? Allowed
Snippet May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown? Allowed
AI summary May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article? Limited
Retrieval / RAG May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation? Not asserted
Model training May the content be used to train AI models? Not asserted
Commercial reuse May the content be reused commercially? Not permitted

Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.

Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand

News AI Authors face backlash for participation in 2022 Google AI study The 'Shameful 13' include speculative fiction luminaries Ken Liu and Robin Sloan. By Max Miller Aug. 11, 2026 2:24 pm EST josefkubes/Shutterstock In the spring of 2022, Google began reaching out to a series of writers, including award-winning science-fiction authors and New York Times bestsellers, for feedback on an experimental writing tool. Four years later, their participation has corners of the literary world up in arms. Google researchers knew at the time that they were approaching a breakthrough point with large language models (LLMs). DeepMind, the company's AI division, was internally testing a natural language generation model called LaMDA which had demonstrated emergent writing capabilities.

Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at Engadget.

Anonymous · no account needed
Share 𝕏 Facebook Reddit LinkedIn Threads WhatsApp Bluesky Mastodon Email

Discussion

0 comments

More from Engadget