China coal mine blast kills at least 90, more missing

4 sources covered this compare →

Coverage varies in emphasis and detail. Bloomberg and Japan Times focused on the scale of the disaster and the number of injured, while Al Jazeera highlighted the specifics of the explosion's cause. The Jerusalem Post included a statement…

No Author· May 23, 2026 · 8:27 AM UTC ·1 min read · 0 reactions · 0 comments · 31 views

China coal mine blast kills at least 90, more missing

At least 123 people were also sent to hospital for treatment, four of whom were in critical or severe condition, state broadcaster CCTV said.

How this story was covered

4 outlets in our directory ran this story, first to last over 3 hours. Coverage spans 3 points on the political spectrum — 1 lean left, 1 centre, 1 lean right.

Lean left · 1Centre · 1Lean right · 1

▪ China coal mine blast kills at least 90, leaves nine missing — Al Jazeera English
▪ At least 90 killed in China's worst coal mine disaster in over 16 years — The Jerusalem Post | JPost.com
▪ China Coal Mine Explosion Kills 90 in Deadliest Blast Since 2009 - Bloomberg.com — Google News

About this source

Japan Times publishes from Japan and files mainly under world. We currently carry 650 of its stories.

All Japan Times coverage →

Original article

Japan Times · No Author

Read full at Japan Times →

Story provenance

Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record

inspect →

Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.

Record

Original publisher	Japan Times
Canonical URL	https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2026/05/23/asia-pacific/china-mining-explosion/
Publication time	Sat, 23 May 2026 17:27:00 +0900
Retrieval time	2026-05-23T08:32:25.829Z
Last seen	2026-05-23T08:32:25.829Z
Headline source	Publisher (no WeSearch rewrite)
Excerpt source	publisher description
Excerpt method	Publisher-supplied description / RSS summary field.
Summary	None yet
Summary source text	description
Citation coverage	No WeSearch summary has been generated for this story yet.
Cluster	IxXzXPHdyycv · 4 stories
Cluster logic	Grouped by semantic title/content similarity across sources within a rolling window. Same-publisher template collisions are excluded from coverage comparison.
Ranking reason	Story pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking.
Publisher visit	Yes — open original
Substitutes article?	No — link-out required for full text

Rights status (four layers)

Publisher-declared

No publisher-confirmed rights record for this source yet.

Machine-readable

No source-specific machine-readable restriction detected beyond the public feed.

WeSearch interpretation

WeSearch declared handling (basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed). This is WeSearch policy, not a legal grant on the publisher's behalf.

Unknown

Retrieval and training permissions are not asserted unless the publisher confirms them.

WeSearch handling by dimension

Indexing	May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)?	Allowed
Snippet	May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown?	Allowed
AI summary	May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article?	Limited
Retrieval / RAG	May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation?	Not asserted
Model training	May the content be used to train AI models?	Not asserted
Commercial reuse	May the content be reused commercially?	Not permitted

Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.

Open original publisher → Source rights JSON → Machine-readable provenance → Rights framework → WESEARCH-STORY-PROVENANCE-V1

Anonymous · no account needed

Discussion

0 comments