Clean coal? Yes; Dems’ radical climate dogma? No
The California Post editorial board criticizes Democrats for their climate policies, arguing they lead to increased costs for Californians. They support President Trump's recent executive order to fund clean coal projects, claiming it will boost jobs and national security. The editorial suggests that the current green policies are detrimental and that a shift towards coal could benefit the state.
- ▪Democrats' climate policies are driving up costs for energy, housing, and transportation in California.
- ▪President Trump's executive order will allocate nearly $700 million to coal projects in 13 states, including California.
- ▪The funding includes $75 million for a coal export terminal in Oakland, expected to ship millions of tons of coal to Asia by 2028.
New York Post files mainly under news. We currently carry 11,003 of its stories.
Story provenance
Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record
inspect →
Story provenance
Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.
Record
| Original publisher | California Post |
| Canonical URL | https://nypost.com/2026/06/05/opinion/clean-coal-beats-dems-radical-climate-dogma/ |
| Publication time | Fri, 05 Jun 2026 22:18:38 -0400 |
| Retrieval time | 2026-06-06T03:02:13.748Z |
| Last seen | 2026-06-06T03:37:55.328Z |
| Headline source | Publisher (no WeSearch rewrite) |
| Excerpt source | publisher body |
| Excerpt method | First ~120 words (~800 chars) of extracted publisher body, fair-use limited. |
| Summary | WeSearch · cerebras-chat (WeSearch summarizer) |
| Summary source text | contentText |
| Citation coverage | Summary is a WeSearch-generated derivative; primary citation is the original publisher URL. |
| Cluster | Rqcnoaddv3p1 |
| Cluster logic | Grouped by semantic title/content similarity across sources within a rolling window. Same-publisher template collisions are excluded from coverage comparison. |
| Ranking reason | Story pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking. |
| Publisher visit | Yes — open original |
| Substitutes article? | No — link-out required for full text |
Rights status (four layers)
WeSearch handling by dimension
| Indexing | May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)? | Allowed |
| Snippet | May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown? | Allowed |
| AI summary | May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article? | Limited |
| Retrieval / RAG | May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation? | Not asserted |
| Model training | May the content be used to train AI models? | Not asserted |
| Commercial reuse | May the content be reused commercially? | Not permitted |
Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
Opinion Clean coal? Yes; Dems’ radical climate dogma? No By CA Post Editorial Board Published June 5, 2026, 10:18 p.m. ET See more of our coverage in your search results. Add The California Post on Google Democrats’ radical green playbook is showing its decrepitude. Californians are sick of far-left climate policies that drive up prices for everything from energy to housing to gas prices and transportation. And the more the left clings to climate dogma, the further behind the state and nation fall to China, which builds coal plants at the rate of about two per week. Coal offers safe, cheap and reliable energy; Beijing gets that, even if Gov. Gavin Newsom and his fellow Dems don’t. Democrats’ radical green playbook is showing its decrepitude.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at California Post.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from California Post
