Diverge to Induce Prompting: Multi-Rationale Induction for Zero-Shot Reasoning
The paper introduces a new framework called Diverge-to-Induce Prompting (DIP) aimed at improving zero-shot reasoning in large language models. By generating multiple diverse rationales for each question, DIP enhances the reasoning process beyond single-strategy approaches. Experimental results indicate that this method significantly outperforms traditional prompting techniques.
- ▪DIP generates multiple high-level rationales for each question.
- ▪Each rationale is elaborated into a detailed draft plan.
- ▪The framework enhances zero-shot reasoning accuracy without resource-intensive sampling.
arXiv cs.AI files mainly under ai research. We currently carry 1,128 of its stories.
Story provenance
Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record
inspect →
Story provenance
Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.
Record
| Original publisher | arXiv cs.AI |
| Canonical URL | https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.08028 |
| Publication time | Fri, 22 May 2026 00:00:00 -0400 |
| Retrieval time | 2026-05-22T04:02:00.009Z |
| Last seen | 2026-05-22T04:02:00.009Z |
| Headline source | Publisher (no WeSearch rewrite) |
| Excerpt source | publisher body |
| Excerpt method | First ~120 words (~800 chars) of extracted publisher body, fair-use limited. |
| Summary | WeSearch · cerebras-chat (WeSearch summarizer) |
| Summary source text | contentText |
| Citation coverage | Summary is a WeSearch-generated derivative; primary citation is the original publisher URL. |
| Cluster | R8W1X5B9yN2I |
| Cluster logic | Grouped by semantic title/content similarity across sources within a rolling window. Same-publisher template collisions are excluded from coverage comparison. |
| Ranking reason | Story pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking. |
| Publisher visit | Yes — open original |
| Substitutes article? | No — link-out required for full text |
Rights status (four layers)
WeSearch handling by dimension
| Indexing | May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)? | Allowed |
| Snippet | May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown? | Allowed |
| AI summary | May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article? | Limited |
| Retrieval / RAG | May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation? | Not asserted |
| Model training | May the content be used to train AI models? | Not asserted |
| Commercial reuse | May the content be reused commercially? | Not permitted |
Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
Computer Science > Computation and Language arXiv:2602.08028 (cs) [Submitted on 8 Feb 2026] Title:Diverge to Induce Prompting: Multi-Rationale Induction for Zero-Shot Reasoning Authors:Po-Chun Chen, Hen-Hsen Huang, Hsin-Hsi Chen View a PDF of the paper titled Diverge to Induce Prompting: Multi-Rationale Induction for Zero-Shot Reasoning, by Po-Chun Chen and 2 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:To address the instability of unguided reasoning paths in standard Chain-of-Thought prompting, recent methods guide large language models (LLMs) by first eliciting a single reasoning strategy. However, relying on just one strategy for each question can still limit performance across diverse tasks.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at arXiv cs.AI.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from arXiv cs.AI
