WeSearch

From LLM-Generated Conjectures to Lean Formalizations: Automated Polynomial Inequality Proving via Sum-of-Squares Certificates

·3 min read · 0 reactions · 0 comments · 39 views
From LLM-Generated Conjectures to Lean Formalizations: Automated Polynomial Inequality Proving via Sum-of-Squares Certificates
TL;DR · WeSearch summary

A new framework called NSPI has been proposed for automated polynomial inequality proving. This method combines large language models (LLMs) with symbolic computation to enhance scalability and effectiveness. The framework has shown promising results in experiments involving polynomials with up to 10 variables.

Key facts
About this source

arXiv cs.AI files mainly under ai research. We currently carry 1,128 of its stories.

Original article
arXiv cs.AI
Read full at arXiv cs.AI →

Story provenance

Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record
inspect →

Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.

Record

Original publisherarXiv cs.AI
Canonical URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2605.15445
Publication timeMon, 18 May 2026 00:00:00 -0400
Retrieval time2026-05-18T04:04:54.418Z
Last seen2026-05-18T04:04:54.418Z
Headline sourcePublisher (no WeSearch rewrite)
Excerpt sourcepublisher body
Excerpt methodFirst ~120 words (~800 chars) of extracted publisher body, fair-use limited.
SummaryWeSearch · cerebras-chat (WeSearch summarizer)
Summary source textcontentText
Citation coverageSummary is a WeSearch-generated derivative; primary citation is the original publisher URL.
Clusterq84bliFo6tVl
Cluster logicGrouped by semantic title/content similarity across sources within a rolling window. Same-publisher template collisions are excluded from coverage comparison.
Ranking reasonStory pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking.
Publisher visitYes — open original
Substitutes article?No — link-out required for full text

Rights status (four layers)

Publisher-declared
No publisher-confirmed rights record for this source yet.
Machine-readable
No source-specific machine-readable restriction detected beyond the public feed.
WeSearch interpretation
WeSearch declared handling (basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed). This is WeSearch policy, not a legal grant on the publisher's behalf.
Unknown
Retrieval and training permissions are not asserted unless the publisher confirms them.

WeSearch handling by dimension

Indexing May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)? Allowed
Snippet May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown? Allowed
AI summary May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article? Limited
Retrieval / RAG May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation? Not asserted
Model training May the content be used to train AI models? Not asserted
Commercial reuse May the content be reused commercially? Not permitted

Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.

Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand

Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence arXiv:2605.15445 (cs) [Submitted on 14 May 2026] Title:From LLM-Generated Conjectures to Lean Formalizations: Automated Polynomial Inequality Proving via Sum-of-Squares Certificates Authors:Ruobing Zuo, Hanrui Zhao, Gaolei He, Zhengfeng Yang, Jianlin Wang View a PDF of the paper titled From LLM-Generated Conjectures to Lean Formalizations: Automated Polynomial Inequality Proving via Sum-of-Squares Certificates, by Ruobing Zuo and 4 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Automated proving of polynomial inequalities is a fundamental challenge in automated mathematical reasoning, where rich algebraic structure and a rapidly growing certificate search space hinder scalability.

Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at arXiv cs.AI.

Anonymous · no account needed
Share 𝕏 Facebook Reddit LinkedIn Threads WhatsApp Bluesky Mastodon Email

Discussion

0 comments

More from arXiv cs.AI