Ghislaine Maxwell’s five-story UES townhome, once used for lavish parties, sells for $16.5M
Real Estate Ghislaine Maxwell’s five-story UES townhome, once used for lavish parties, sells for $16.5M By Mary K. ET See more of our coverage in your search results. Add The New York Post on Google The Manhattan townhouse where Ghislaine Maxwell once hosted champagne-soaked dinner parties and charity galas for New York’s elite has quietly sold for $16.5 million.
- ▪Real Estate Ghislaine Maxwell’s five-story UES townhome, once used for lavish parties, sells for $16.5M By Mary K.
- ▪ET See more of our coverage in your search results.
- ▪Add The New York Post on Google The Manhattan townhouse where Ghislaine Maxwell once hosted champagne-soaked dinner parties and charity galas for New York’s elite has quietly sold for $16.5 million.
New York Post files mainly under news. We currently carry 11,003 of its stories.
Story provenance
Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record
inspect →
Story provenance
Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.
Record
| Original publisher | New York Post |
| Canonical URL | https://nypost.com/2026/06/19/real-estate/ghislaine-maxwells-upper-east-side-townhouse-sells-for-16-5-million/ |
| Publication time | Fri, 19 Jun 2026 13:09:22 -0400 |
| Retrieval time | 2026-06-19T17:15:36.020Z |
| Last seen | 2026-06-19T17:20:43.819Z |
| Headline source | Publisher (no WeSearch rewrite) |
| Excerpt source | publisher body |
| Excerpt method | First ~120 words (~800 chars) of extracted publisher body, fair-use limited. |
| Summary | WeSearch · cerebras-chat (WeSearch summarizer) |
| Summary source text | contentText |
| Citation coverage | Summary is a WeSearch-generated derivative; primary citation is the original publisher URL. |
| Cluster | e1gmDPtLVPeY |
| Cluster logic | Grouped by semantic title/content similarity across sources within a rolling window. Same-publisher template collisions are excluded from coverage comparison. |
| Ranking reason | Story pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking. |
| Publisher visit | Yes — open original |
| Substitutes article? | No — link-out required for full text |
Rights status (four layers)
WeSearch handling by dimension
| Indexing | May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)? | Allowed |
| Snippet | May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown? | Allowed |
| AI summary | May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article? | Limited |
| Retrieval / RAG | May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation? | Not asserted |
| Model training | May the content be used to train AI models? | Not asserted |
| Commercial reuse | May the content be reused commercially? | Not permitted |
Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
Real Estate Ghislaine Maxwell’s five-story UES townhome, once used for lavish parties, sells for $16.5M By Mary K. Jacob Published June 19, 2026, 1:09 p.m. ET See more of our coverage in your search results. Add The New York Post on Google The Manhattan townhouse where Ghislaine Maxwell once hosted champagne-soaked dinner parties and charity galas for New York’s elite has quietly sold for $16.5 million. The five-story Beaux-Arts limestone and brick residence on 116 E 65th Street, where the former socialite lived for roughly 16 years before her 2020 arrest, traded hands Tuesday, according to property records. An LLC that picked up the property in 2022 for $16 million sold it to a trust, according to Mansion Global and the listing was handled by Sabrina Saltiel of Douglas Elliman.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at New York Post.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from New York Post
