How Fossil Fuel Companies Made Us Believe Gas Was Clean
In an aerial view, the ETC Mi Vida Gas Plant is seen on March 18, 2026 in Pecos, Texas.Brandon Bell/Getty Get your news from a source that’s not owned and controlled by oligarchs. About half of Americans think natural gas—a methane-based, planet-warming fuel—is a “clean” energy source, according to a recent poll. And a long-running fossil fuel industry marketing campaign might be to blame.
- ▪In an aerial view, the ETC Mi Vida Gas Plant is seen on March 18, 2026 in Pecos, Texas.Brandon Bell/Getty Get your news from a source that’s not owned and controlled by oligarchs.
- ▪About half of Americans think natural gas—a methane-based, planet-warming fuel—is a “clean” energy source, according to a recent poll.
- ▪And a long-running fossil fuel industry marketing campaign might be to blame.
Mother Jones files mainly under politics. We currently carry 167 of its stories.
Story provenance
Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record
inspect →
Story provenance
Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.
Record
| Original publisher | Mother Jones |
| Canonical URL | https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2026/07/natural-gas-methane-pollution-clean-branding-myth/ |
| Publication time | Sat, 25 Jul 2026 17:12:11 +0000 |
| Retrieval time | 2026-07-25T17:22:19.964Z |
| Last seen | 2026-07-25T17:22:19.964Z |
| Headline source | Publisher (no WeSearch rewrite) |
| Excerpt source | publisher body |
| Excerpt method | First ~120 words (~800 chars) of extracted publisher body, fair-use limited. |
| Summary | WeSearch · cerebras-chat (WeSearch summarizer) |
| Summary source text | contentText |
| Citation coverage | Summary is a WeSearch-generated derivative; primary citation is the original publisher URL. |
| Cluster | KZulgSa7_WdG |
| Cluster logic | Grouped by semantic title/content similarity across sources within a rolling window. Same-publisher template collisions are excluded from coverage comparison. |
| Ranking reason | Story pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking. |
| Publisher visit | Yes — open original |
| Substitutes article? | No — link-out required for full text |
Rights status (four layers)
WeSearch handling by dimension
| Indexing | May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)? | Allowed |
| Snippet | May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown? | Allowed |
| AI summary | May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article? | Limited |
| Retrieval / RAG | May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation? | Not asserted |
| Model training | May the content be used to train AI models? | Not asserted |
| Commercial reuse | May the content be reused commercially? | Not permitted |
Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
In an aerial view, the ETC Mi Vida Gas Plant is seen on March 18, 2026 in Pecos, Texas.Brandon Bell/Getty Get your news from a source that’s not owned and controlled by oligarchs. Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily. About half of Americans think natural gas—a methane-based, planet-warming fuel—is a “clean” energy source, according to a recent poll. And a long-running fossil fuel industry marketing campaign might be to blame. The “clean natural gas” label is a myth. Methane, the primary component of natural gas fuel, is a far more potent greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide. But the myth persists in large part due to a savvy, decades-long branding campaign by oil and gas corporations.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at Mother Jones.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from Mother Jones
