How I Built a Free Random Letter Generator — And Got 7,800+ Impressions in 8 Weeks with Zero Ad Spend
The article details the creation of a free random letter generator called randomletter.io, built by an SEO and WordPress specialist. The author emphasizes the importance of performance and accessibility in web development, achieving high scores on PageSpeed metrics. After eight weeks, the tool garnered over 7,800 impressions on Google without any ad spend.
- ▪The random letter generator was built using WordPress and Vanilla JS for optimal performance and simplicity.
- ▪The tool achieved a perfect accessibility score of 100/100 on PageSpeed Insights, ensuring it is usable for all individuals.
- ▪In just eight weeks, the site received 7,870 impressions and 85 clicks on Google Search, with an average position of 18.2.
DEV.to (Top) files mainly under programming. We currently carry 4,924 of its stories.
Story provenance
Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record
inspect →
Story provenance
Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.
Record
| Original publisher | DEV.to (Top) |
| Canonical URL | https://dev.to/shahriyar_anwar_c33c14b38/how-i-built-a-free-random-letter-generator-and-got-7800-impressions-in-8-weeks-with-zero-ad-2gp |
| Publication time | Wed, 20 May 2026 09:26:37 +0000 |
| Retrieval time | 2026-05-20T09:35:01.414Z |
| Last seen | 2026-05-20T09:35:01.414Z |
| Headline source | Publisher (no WeSearch rewrite) |
| Excerpt source | publisher body |
| Excerpt method | First ~120 words (~800 chars) of extracted publisher body, fair-use limited. |
| Summary | WeSearch · cerebras-chat (WeSearch summarizer) |
| Summary source text | contentText |
| Citation coverage | Summary is a WeSearch-generated derivative; primary citation is the original publisher URL. |
| Cluster | MfLBM8FqhuB1 |
| Cluster logic | Grouped by semantic title/content similarity across sources within a rolling window. Same-publisher template collisions are excluded from coverage comparison. |
| Ranking reason | Story pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking. |
| Publisher visit | Yes — open original |
| Substitutes article? | No — link-out required for full text |
Rights status (four layers)
WeSearch handling by dimension
| Indexing | May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)? | Allowed |
| Snippet | May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown? | Allowed |
| AI summary | May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article? | Limited |
| Retrieval / RAG | May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation? | Not asserted |
| Model training | May the content be used to train AI models? | Not asserted |
| Commercial reuse | May the content be reused commercially? | Not permitted |
Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
try { if(localStorage) { let currentUser = localStorage.getItem('current_user'); if (currentUser) { currentUser = JSON.parse(currentUser); if (currentUser.id === 3941638) { document.getElementById('article-show-container').classList.add('current-user-is-article-author'); } } } } catch (e) { console.error(e); } shahriyar anwar Posted on May 20 How I Built a Free Random Letter Generator — And Got 7,800+ Impressions in 8 Weeks with Zero Ad Spend #javascript #webdev #beginners #opensource I'm not a full-time developer. I'm an SEO and WordPress specialist. So when I decided to build and launch a web tool from scratch, I knew I had to be smart about every decision — from the tech stack to how I'd get it in front of people.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at DEV.to (Top).