How I used Claude Code and git worktrees to ship 2 features and fix 3 bugs in one day
Shubhajit Chatterjee shares his experience of using Claude Code and git worktrees to efficiently manage multiple tasks. He faced the challenge of fixing three bugs and implementing two features under tight deadlines. By utilizing git worktrees, he was able to work on multiple tasks simultaneously without the usual complications of switching branches.
- ▪Chatterjee had to fix three bugs and complete two feature implementations with approaching deadlines.
- ▪He experimented with git worktrees to manage multiple tasks in parallel without conflicts.
- ▪Using Claude Code, he was able to set up a workflow that allowed him to work on separate branches simultaneously.
DEV.to (Top) files mainly under programming. We currently carry 4,924 of its stories.
Story provenance
Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record
inspect →
Story provenance
Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.
Record
| Original publisher | DEV.to (Top) |
| Canonical URL | https://dev.to/shubhajit_chatterjee/how-i-used-claude-code-and-git-worktrees-to-ship-2-features-and-fix-3-bugs-in-one-day-325n |
| Publication time | Sat, 16 May 2026 12:05:19 +0000 |
| Retrieval time | 2026-05-16T12:10:18.449Z |
| Last seen | 2026-05-16T12:10:18.449Z |
| Headline source | Publisher (no WeSearch rewrite) |
| Excerpt source | publisher body |
| Excerpt method | First ~120 words (~800 chars) of extracted publisher body, fair-use limited. |
| Summary | WeSearch · cerebras-chat (WeSearch summarizer) |
| Summary source text | contentText |
| Citation coverage | Summary is a WeSearch-generated derivative; primary citation is the original publisher URL. |
| Cluster | xaQaIEnAy_Cc |
| Cluster logic | Grouped by semantic title/content similarity across sources within a rolling window. Same-publisher template collisions are excluded from coverage comparison. |
| Ranking reason | Story pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking. |
| Publisher visit | Yes — open original |
| Substitutes article? | No — link-out required for full text |
Rights status (four layers)
WeSearch handling by dimension
| Indexing | May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)? | Allowed |
| Snippet | May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown? | Allowed |
| AI summary | May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article? | Limited |
| Retrieval / RAG | May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation? | Not asserted |
| Model training | May the content be used to train AI models? | Not asserted |
| Commercial reuse | May the content be reused commercially? | Not permitted |
Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
try { if(localStorage) { let currentUser = localStorage.getItem('current_user'); if (currentUser) { currentUser = JSON.parse(currentUser); if (currentUser.id === 2040226) { document.getElementById('article-show-container').classList.add('current-user-is-article-author'); } } } } catch (e) { console.error(e); } Shubhajit Chatterjee Posted on May 16 How I used Claude Code and git worktrees to ship 2 features and fix 3 bugs in one day #ai #claude #git I want to share an interesting workflow I experimented with recently while working with Claude Code and git worktrees. Background I had a lot on my plate with deadlines approaching. I had to fix 3 bugs and complete 2 feature implementations. And it was not just implementation work.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at DEV.to (Top).
Discussion
0 commentsMore from DEV.to (Top)
