I Built a Chrome Extension That Generates AI Replies for LinkedIn, X and Threads — Here's What I Learned
The article discusses the development of a Chrome extension called Replygen, designed to generate AI-driven replies for social media platforms like LinkedIn, X, and Threads. The author shares insights on the technical challenges faced during the creation process, including issues with platform updates and user engagement. Key improvements were made to enhance user experience and reduce operational costs.
- ▪Replygen was built to help users generate context-aware replies quickly on social media.
- ▪The extension faced challenges due to frequent updates on the platforms, requiring constant adjustments to selectors.
- ▪User feedback led to significant changes in the reply generation process, improving retention rates.
DEV.to (Top) files mainly under programming. We currently carry 4,924 of its stories.
Story provenance
Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record
inspect →
Story provenance
Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.
Record
| Original publisher | DEV.to (Top) |
| Canonical URL | https://dev.to/replygen/i-built-a-chrome-extension-that-generates-ai-replies-for-linkedin-x-and-threads-heres-what-i-55gl |
| Publication time | Sun, 24 May 2026 11:10:04 +0000 |
| Retrieval time | 2026-05-24T11:37:32.397Z |
| Last seen | 2026-05-24T11:37:32.397Z |
| Headline source | Publisher (no WeSearch rewrite) |
| Excerpt source | publisher body |
| Excerpt method | First ~120 words (~800 chars) of extracted publisher body, fair-use limited. |
| Summary | WeSearch · cerebras-chat (WeSearch summarizer) |
| Summary source text | contentText |
| Citation coverage | Summary is a WeSearch-generated derivative; primary citation is the original publisher URL. |
| Cluster | 2RSD7IA7jTq6 · 2 stories |
| Cluster logic | Grouped by semantic title/content similarity across sources within a rolling window. Same-publisher template collisions are excluded from coverage comparison. |
| Ranking reason | Story pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking. |
| Publisher visit | Yes — open original |
| Substitutes article? | No — link-out required for full text |
Rights status (four layers)
WeSearch handling by dimension
| Indexing | May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)? | Allowed |
| Snippet | May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown? | Allowed |
| AI summary | May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article? | Limited |
| Retrieval / RAG | May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation? | Not asserted |
| Model training | May the content be used to train AI models? | Not asserted |
| Commercial reuse | May the content be reused commercially? | Not permitted |
Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
try { if(localStorage) { let currentUser = localStorage.getItem('current_user'); if (currentUser) { currentUser = JSON.parse(currentUser); if (currentUser.id === 3948860) { document.getElementById('article-show-container').classList.add('current-user-is-article-author'); } } } } catch (e) { console.error(e); } Tanuj Posted on May 24 I Built a Chrome Extension That Generates AI Replies for LinkedIn, X and Threads — Here's What I Learned #chromeextension #ai #saas #buildinpublic Building Replygen started as a personal itch. As a solo SaaS founder, I needed to stay consistently active on LinkedIn, X, and Threads to drive organic distribution — but crafting thoughtful replies at scale was burning time I didn't have.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at DEV.to (Top).