I Built a Tool That Proves Your Code Is Yours — Here's What Gemma 4 Made Possible
Simran Shaikh developed VibeSafe, a browser-based tool that verifies code authorship by identifying human architectural decisions versus AI-assisted patterns using Gemma 4. The tool leverages Gemma 4's 262K context window to analyze entire codebases in one prompt, enabling consistent cross-file reasoning. By focusing on intent and design tradeoffs, VibeSafe aims to address growing skepticism about code ownership in AI-assisted development.
- ▪VibeSafe uses Gemma 4 31B to generate a Proof of Authorship certificate that distinguishes human decisions from AI-generated code.
- ▪The tool analyzes full projects in one prompt using Gemma 4's 262K context window, avoiding issues with chunked analysis.
- ▪Gemma 4's dense 31B model was chosen over the MoE variant for consistent reasoning across all code tokens.
- ▪Architectural patterns like stateless token design and privacy-first frontend calls are flagged as human decisions, while boilerplate code is marked as AI-assisted.
- ▪VibeSafe addresses the growing trust gap in software reviews where AI assistance raises questions about original authorship.
DEV.to (Top) files mainly under programming. We currently carry 4,924 of its stories.
Story provenance
Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record
inspect →
Story provenance
Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.
Record
| Original publisher | DEV.to (Top) |
| Canonical URL | https://dev.to/simranshaikh20_50/-i-built-a-tool-that-proves-your-code-is-yours-heres-what-gemma-4-made-possible-4glh |
| Publication time | Sat, 16 May 2026 11:01:48 +0000 |
| Retrieval time | 2026-05-16T11:10:18.318Z |
| Last seen | 2026-05-16T11:10:18.318Z |
| Headline source | Publisher (no WeSearch rewrite) |
| Excerpt source | publisher body |
| Excerpt method | First ~120 words (~800 chars) of extracted publisher body, fair-use limited. |
| Summary | WeSearch · cerebras-chat (WeSearch summarizer) |
| Summary source text | contentText |
| Citation coverage | Summary is a WeSearch-generated derivative; primary citation is the original publisher URL. |
| Cluster | z_8eQ6dazJav |
| Cluster logic | Grouped by semantic title/content similarity across sources within a rolling window. Same-publisher template collisions are excluded from coverage comparison. |
| Ranking reason | Story pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking. |
| Publisher visit | Yes — open original |
| Substitutes article? | No — link-out required for full text |
Rights status (four layers)
WeSearch handling by dimension
| Indexing | May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)? | Allowed |
| Snippet | May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown? | Allowed |
| AI summary | May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article? | Limited |
| Retrieval / RAG | May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation? | Not asserted |
| Model training | May the content be used to train AI models? | Not asserted |
| Commercial reuse | May the content be reused commercially? | Not permitted |
Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
try { if(localStorage) { let currentUser = localStorage.getItem('current_user'); if (currentUser) { currentUser = JSON.parse(currentUser); if (currentUser.id === 3468700) { document.getElementById('article-show-container').classList.add('current-user-is-article-author'); } } } } catch (e) { console.error(e); } Simran Shaikh Posted on May 16 I Built a Tool That Proves Your Code Is Yours — Here's What Gemma 4 Made Possible #devchallenge #gemmachallenge #gemma Gemma 4 Challenge: Build With Gemma 4 Submission There is a question spreading quietly through the software industry right now. Hiring managers are asking it. Hackathon judges are asking it. Open source maintainers are asking it. "Did you actually build this?" Nobody has a good answer yet.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at DEV.to (Top).