I don't think AI will make your processes go faster
The article argues that AI is unlikely to significantly speed up business processes, emphasizing that process optimization efforts often focus on the wrong areas. The author revisits classic management books to highlight the importance of understanding bottlenecks, such as in software development. Simply adding more people or assuming AI will solve delays is an oversimplified and ineffective approach.
- ▪The author re-read 'The Toyota Way' and 'The Goal' to gain insights into effective process optimization.
- ▪A Gantt chart is used to illustrate that software development is typically the longest phase in a project timeline.
- ▪Common responses to delays, such as adding more staff or relying on AI, are often misguided and fail to address root causes.
Hacker News (Newest) files mainly under programming. We currently carry 5,306 of its stories.
Story provenance
Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record
inspect →
Story provenance
Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.
Record
| Original publisher | Hacker News (Newest) |
| Canonical URL | https://frederickvanbrabant.com/blog/2026-05-15-i-dont-think-ai-will-make-your-processes-go-faster/ |
| Publication time | Sun, 17 May 2026 12:13:45 +0000 |
| Retrieval time | 2026-05-17T12:22:13.120Z |
| Last seen | 2026-05-17T12:22:13.120Z |
| Headline source | Publisher (no WeSearch rewrite) |
| Excerpt source | publisher body |
| Excerpt method | First ~120 words (~800 chars) of extracted publisher body, fair-use limited. |
| Summary | WeSearch · cerebras-chat (WeSearch summarizer) |
| Summary source text | contentText |
| Citation coverage | Summary is a WeSearch-generated derivative; primary citation is the original publisher URL. |
| Cluster | 9OTsaddfMJQD |
| Cluster logic | Grouped by semantic title/content similarity across sources within a rolling window. Same-publisher template collisions are excluded from coverage comparison. |
| Ranking reason | Story pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking. |
| Publisher visit | Yes — open original |
| Substitutes article? | No — link-out required for full text |
Rights status (four layers)
WeSearch handling by dimension
| Indexing | May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)? | Allowed |
| Snippet | May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown? | Allowed |
| AI summary | May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article? | Limited |
| Retrieval / RAG | May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation? | Not asserted |
| Model training | May the content be used to train AI models? | Not asserted |
| Commercial reuse | May the content be reused commercially? | Not permitted |
Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
15 May 2026 • 5 min readI don't think AI will make your processes go fasterBusiness-Layer ProcessesI have the feeling that every organization out there is, at least partially, focusing on process optimization, something that often happens when the market is down. These days there is also the AI angle to the entire thing, and the unrealistic expectations that follow it.To come fully prepared for this, I’ve decided to re-read two absolute classics in this space: The Toyota way & The Goal 1. I’ve read both of these books in college, but re-reading them made me realize that a lot of these process optimization exercises are too simplistic in nature, and often misunderstand what to focus on.The visual bottleneckLet me show what I mean.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at Hacker News (Newest).