WeSearch

I manually counted 4,000 steps to test the Apple Watch Ultra 3 vs Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra 2 — and Samsung wins the accuracy battle, with better elevation data too

https://www.tomsguide.com/author/dan-bracaglia· ·13 min read · 0 reactions · 0 comments · 15 views
 I manually counted 4,000 steps to test the Apple Watch Ultra 3 vs Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra 2 —  and Samsung wins the accuracy battle, with better elevation data too
TL;DR · WeSearch summary

I decided to find out by manually counting 4,000 steps with one on either wrist.Aside from the obvious — the Apple Watch Ultra 3 is for iOS users, and the Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra 2 is for the Android faithful — these two smartwatches are remarkably evenly matched. For starters, the Apple Watch is $100 more than the Galaxy Watch, $799 vs $699. You may like I manually counted 5,000 steps to test the Apple Watch 11 vs Fitbit Air, and Apple wins the accuracy battle while offering superior elevation data Can the $99 Fitbit Air beat the $799 Apple Watch Ultra 3 at fitness tracking?

Key facts
About this source

Tom's Guide files mainly under tech. We currently carry 1,145 of its stories.

Original article
Tom's Guide · https://www.tomsguide.com/author/dan-bracaglia
Read full at Tom's Guide →

Story provenance

Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record
inspect →

Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.

Record

Original publisherTom's Guide
Canonical URLhttps://www.tomsguide.com/wellness/smartwatches/i-manually-counted-4-000-steps-to-test-the-apple-watch-ultra-3-vs-samsung-galaxy-watch-ultra-2-and-samsung-wins-the-accuracy-battle-with-better-elevation-data-too
Publication timeFri, 24 Jul 2026 10:00:00 +0000
Retrieval time2026-07-24T10:07:36.524Z
Last seen2026-07-24T10:07:45.044Z
Headline sourcePublisher (no WeSearch rewrite)
Excerpt sourcepublisher body
Excerpt methodFirst ~120 words (~800 chars) of extracted publisher body, fair-use limited.
SummaryWeSearch · cerebras-chat (WeSearch summarizer)
Summary source textcontentText
Citation coverageSummary is a WeSearch-generated derivative; primary citation is the original publisher URL.
ClusterTs4bz0XylF19
Cluster logicGrouped by semantic title/content similarity across sources within a rolling window. Same-publisher template collisions are excluded from coverage comparison.
Ranking reasonStory pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking.
Publisher visitYes — open original
Substitutes article?No — link-out required for full text

Rights status (four layers)

Publisher-declared
No publisher-confirmed rights record for this source yet.
Machine-readable
No source-specific machine-readable restriction detected beyond the public feed.
WeSearch interpretation
WeSearch declared handling (basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed). This is WeSearch policy, not a legal grant on the publisher's behalf.
Unknown
Retrieval and training permissions are not asserted unless the publisher confirms them.

WeSearch handling by dimension

Indexing May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)? Allowed
Snippet May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown? Allowed
AI summary May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article? Limited
Retrieval / RAG May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation? Not asserted
Model training May the content be used to train AI models? Not asserted
Commercial reuse May the content be reused commercially? Not permitted

Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.

Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand

Wellness Smartwatches I manually counted 4,000 steps to test the Apple Watch Ultra 3 vs Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra 2 — and Samsung wins the accuracy battle, with better elevation data too Face Off By Dan Bracaglia Published 24 July 2026 But Apple's distance data was closer When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Here’s how it works. (Image credit: Dan Bracaglia/Tom's Guide) Copy link Facebook X Reddit Email Share this article 0 Join the conversation Follow us Add us as a preferred source on Google Newsletter Subscribe to our newsletter Which rugged smartwatch, the Apple Watch Ultra 3 or the new Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra 2, is the better device for tracking outdoor workouts and adventures? I decided to find out by manually counting 4,000 steps…

Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at Tom's Guide.

Anonymous · no account needed
Share 𝕏 Facebook Reddit LinkedIn Threads WhatsApp Bluesky Mastodon Email

Discussion

0 comments

More from Tom's Guide