I stopped uploading my files to random websites and built my own tools instead
The article discusses the author's decision to stop using online file compression tools and instead create their own browser-based utilities. This led to the development of PureTools, a suite of 54 free tools that operate entirely client-side, ensuring user privacy. The author emphasizes the importance of keeping files local and avoiding the risks associated with uploading to unknown websites.
- ▪The author stopped using random online tools after reading a privacy policy that raised concerns.
- ▪PureTools consists of 54 utilities for various tasks, all running in the browser without file uploads.
- ▪The tools are built using simple technologies like HTML, CSS, and vanilla JavaScript, focusing on user privacy.
DEV.to (Top) files mainly under programming. We currently carry 4,924 of its stories.
Story provenance
Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record
inspect →
Story provenance
Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.
Record
| Original publisher | DEV.to (Top) |
| Canonical URL | https://dev.to/puretools/i-stopped-uploading-my-files-to-random-websites-and-built-my-own-tools-instead-1h5l |
| Publication time | Sat, 23 May 2026 23:41:35 +0000 |
| Retrieval time | 2026-05-24T00:07:28.624Z |
| Last seen | 2026-05-24T00:07:28.624Z |
| Headline source | Publisher (no WeSearch rewrite) |
| Excerpt source | publisher body |
| Excerpt method | First ~120 words (~800 chars) of extracted publisher body, fair-use limited. |
| Summary | WeSearch · cerebras-chat (WeSearch summarizer) |
| Summary source text | contentText |
| Citation coverage | Summary is a WeSearch-generated derivative; primary citation is the original publisher URL. |
| Cluster | txk3Sx7wWi5X |
| Cluster logic | Grouped by semantic title/content similarity across sources within a rolling window. Same-publisher template collisions are excluded from coverage comparison. |
| Ranking reason | Story pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking. |
| Publisher visit | Yes — open original |
| Substitutes article? | No — link-out required for full text |
Rights status (four layers)
WeSearch handling by dimension
| Indexing | May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)? | Allowed |
| Snippet | May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown? | Allowed |
| AI summary | May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article? | Limited |
| Retrieval / RAG | May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation? | Not asserted |
| Model training | May the content be used to train AI models? | Not asserted |
| Commercial reuse | May the content be reused commercially? | Not permitted |
Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
try { if(localStorage) { let currentUser = localStorage.getItem('current_user'); if (currentUser) { currentUser = JSON.parse(currentUser); if (currentUser.id === 3948342) { document.getElementById('article-show-container').classList.add('current-user-is-article-author'); } } } } catch (e) { console.error(e); } PureTools Posted on May 23 I stopped uploading my files to random websites and built my own tools instead #webdev #javascript #opensource #privacy Every week I'd find myself doing the same thing. Googling "compress PDF Every week I'd find myself doing the same thing. Googling "compress PDF online free", clicking the first result, uploading my file to some website I'd never heard of, and hoping for the best. One day I actually read the privacy policy of one of these tools.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at DEV.to (Top).