I tried Samsung’s huge Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra, and its disappointing chipset lets down an otherwise fantastic media and gaming machine
The Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra features a large 14.6-inch display but is let down by its MediaTek chipset. While it offers improvements over its predecessor, the performance does not justify its high price compared to competitors like the iPad Pro. Overall, it is recommended for media consumption but may not satisfy power users seeking professional performance.
- ▪The Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra has a massive 14.6-inch display that is ideal for watching movies and gaming.
- ▪Despite some improvements, the MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ chipset underperforms compared to the Snapdragon 8 Elite processor in the Galaxy S26 Ultra.
- ▪The tablet's starting price is $1,299, making it one of Samsung's most expensive tablets.
TechRadar publishes from United Kingdom and files mainly under tech. We currently carry 1,533 of its stories.
Story provenance
Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record
inspect →
Story provenance
Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.
Record
| Original publisher | TechRadar |
| Canonical URL | https://www.techradar.com/tablets/samsung-galaxy-tab-s11-ultra-review |
| Publication time | Fri, 22 May 2026 06:36:05 +0000 |
| Retrieval time | 2026-05-22T06:42:00.805Z |
| Last seen | 2026-05-22T06:42:00.805Z |
| Headline source | Publisher (no WeSearch rewrite) |
| Excerpt source | publisher body |
| Excerpt method | First ~120 words (~800 chars) of extracted publisher body, fair-use limited. |
| Summary | WeSearch · cerebras-chat (WeSearch summarizer) |
| Summary source text | contentText |
| Citation coverage | Summary is a WeSearch-generated derivative; primary citation is the original publisher URL. |
| Cluster | LipsAJzE0-uM |
| Cluster logic | Grouped by semantic title/content similarity across sources within a rolling window. Same-publisher template collisions are excluded from coverage comparison. |
| Ranking reason | Story pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking. |
| Publisher visit | Yes — open original |
| Substitutes article? | No — link-out required for full text |
Rights status (four layers)
WeSearch handling by dimension
| Indexing | May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)? | Allowed |
| Snippet | May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown? | Allowed |
| AI summary | May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article? | Limited |
| Retrieval / RAG | May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation? | Not asserted |
| Model training | May the content be used to train AI models? | Not asserted |
| Commercial reuse | May the content be reused commercially? | Not permitted |
Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
TechRadar Verdict With a massive 14.6-inch display, the Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra is an impressive tablet that might be great for some, but power users would be better off with an iPad Pro instead. While it’s an improvement over its predecessor, the MediaTek chipset used here is disappointing compared to the Galaxy S26 Ultra’s phone processor, making it hard to justify the tablet’s high price tag. If it were cheaper or used a more capable Snapdragon processor, I’d be raving about the Tab S11 Ultra, but as it stands, I’d recommend getting something else entirely.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at TechRadar.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from TechRadar
