I was manually comparing two versions of a contract for 2 hours before I built this tool

May 24, 2026 · 9:16 AM UTC ·4 min read · 0 reactions · 0 comments · 25 views

TL;DR · WeSearch summary

Ubed Sheikh developed a tool to compare long-form text documents after struggling to find an effective solution for reviewing contract changes. The tool allows users to compare text directly, upload files, or analyze web pages without uploading content to a server. It features word-level diffs, a similarity score, and multiple viewing options to enhance document comparison efficiency.

Key facts

▪The tool processes everything in the browser, ensuring privacy for sensitive documents.
▪It offers three comparison modes: text paste, file uploads, and URL comparisons.
▪Users can see word-level changes rather than just line-level differences, making it more useful for detailed document reviews.

About this source

DEV.to (Top) files mainly under programming. We currently carry 4,924 of its stories.

All DEV.to (Top) coverage →

Original article

DEV.to (Top)

Read full at DEV.to (Top) →

Story provenance

Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record

inspect →

Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.

Record

Original publisher	DEV.to (Top)
Canonical URL	https://dev.to/ubed_sheikh_4d4526b53b452/i-was-manually-comparing-two-versions-of-a-contract-for-2-hours-before-i-built-this-tool-a4o
Publication time	Sun, 24 May 2026 09:16:23 +0000
Retrieval time	2026-05-24T09:37:31.883Z
Last seen	2026-05-24T09:37:31.883Z
Headline source	Publisher (no WeSearch rewrite)
Excerpt source	publisher body
Excerpt method	First ~120 words (~800 chars) of extracted publisher body, fair-use limited.
Summary	WeSearch · cerebras-chat (WeSearch summarizer)
Summary source text	contentText
Citation coverage	Summary is a WeSearch-generated derivative; primary citation is the original publisher URL.
Cluster	FXKROF7_yucX
Cluster logic	Grouped by semantic title/content similarity across sources within a rolling window. Same-publisher template collisions are excluded from coverage comparison.
Ranking reason	Story pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking.
Publisher visit	Yes — open original
Substitutes article?	No — link-out required for full text

Rights status (four layers)

Publisher-declared

No publisher-confirmed rights record for this source yet.

Machine-readable

No source-specific machine-readable restriction detected beyond the public feed.

WeSearch interpretation

WeSearch declared handling (basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed). This is WeSearch policy, not a legal grant on the publisher's behalf.

Unknown

Retrieval and training permissions are not asserted unless the publisher confirms them.

WeSearch handling by dimension

Indexing	May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)?	Allowed
Snippet	May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown?	Allowed
AI summary	May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article?	Limited
Retrieval / RAG	May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation?	Not asserted
Model training	May the content be used to train AI models?	Not asserted
Commercial reuse	May the content be reused commercially?	Not permitted

Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.

Open original publisher → Source rights JSON → Machine-readable provenance → Rights framework → WESEARCH-STORY-PROVENANCE-V1

Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand

try { if(localStorage) { let currentUser = localStorage.getItem('current_user'); if (currentUser) { currentUser = JSON.parse(currentUser); if (currentUser.id === 3936210) { document.getElementById('article-show-container').classList.add('current-user-is-article-author'); } } } } catch (e) { console.error(e); } Ubed Sheikh Posted on May 24 I was manually comparing two versions of a contract for 2 hours before I built this tool #tooling #productivity #webdev #javascript A few months ago I was helping a friend review a revised freelance contract. The client had "made a few small changes" - their words. We had two PDF versions. No track changes. No diff. Just two documents that looked almost identical. So we did what anyone does in that situation: opened both side by side and started reading.

…

Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at DEV.to (Top).

Anonymous · no account needed

Discussion

0 comments