WeSearch

In 1997, NOAA recorded a sound louder than any known animal

Ellsworth Toohey· ·3 min read · 0 reactions · 0 comments · 39 views
In 1997, NOAA recorded a sound louder than any known animal
TL;DR · WeSearch summary

In 1997, NOAA recorded an unusual underwater sound known as 'the Bloop' off the coast of southern Chile. Initially thought to be from a powerful living creature, it was later identified as the result of icequakes. The sound remains a notable example of the ocean's unexplained phenomena, despite its mundane origin.

Key facts
About this source

Boing Boing files mainly under tech. We currently carry 377 of its stories.

Original article
Boing Boing · Ellsworth Toohey
Read full at Boing Boing →

Story provenance

Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record
inspect →

Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.

Record

Original publisherBoing Boing
Canonical URLhttps://boingboing.net/2026/05/19/in-1997-noaa-recorded-a-sound-louder-than-any-known-animal.html
Publication timeTue, 19 May 2026 20:27:41 +0000
Retrieval time2026-05-19T20:44:58.098Z
Last seen2026-05-19T20:44:58.098Z
Headline sourcePublisher (no WeSearch rewrite)
Excerpt sourcepublisher body
Excerpt methodFirst ~120 words (~800 chars) of extracted publisher body, fair-use limited.
SummaryWeSearch · cerebras-chat (WeSearch summarizer)
Summary source textcontentText
Citation coverageSummary is a WeSearch-generated derivative; primary citation is the original publisher URL.
ClusterzkvgKilp79wK
Cluster logicGrouped by semantic title/content similarity across sources within a rolling window. Same-publisher template collisions are excluded from coverage comparison.
Ranking reasonStory pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking.
Publisher visitYes — open original
Substitutes article?No — link-out required for full text

Rights status (four layers)

Publisher-declared
No publisher-confirmed rights record for this source yet.
Machine-readable
No source-specific machine-readable restriction detected beyond the public feed.
WeSearch interpretation
WeSearch declared handling (basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed). This is WeSearch policy, not a legal grant on the publisher's behalf.
Unknown
Retrieval and training permissions are not asserted unless the publisher confirms them.

WeSearch handling by dimension

Indexing May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)? Allowed
Snippet May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown? Allowed
AI summary May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article? Limited
Retrieval / RAG May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation? Not asserted
Model training May the content be used to train AI models? Not asserted
Commercial reuse May the content be reused commercially? Not permitted

Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.

Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand

In 1997, NOAA recorded a sound louder than any known animal Ellsworth Toohey 1:27 pm Tue May 19, 2026 In the summer of 1997, NOAA's underwater microphone network — a Cold War-era array of hydrophones originally built to track Soviet submarines and later repurposed to monitor earthquakes and whale migrations — picked up something strange off the coast of southern Chile. The sound lasted about a minute, rose in frequency as it went, and was loud enough to register on sensors nearly 5,000 kilometers apart. NOAA scientist Christopher Fox noted that the audio profile resembled a living creature, but added that whatever made it would have to be far more powerful than any animal on Earth. The sound — which NOAA nicknamed "the Bloop" — was recorded exactly once and never appeared again.

Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at Boing Boing.

Anonymous · no account needed
Share 𝕏 Facebook Reddit LinkedIn Threads WhatsApp Bluesky Mastodon Email

Discussion

0 comments

More from Boing Boing