IPL 2026 RR vs PBKS: Stoinis powers PBKS to 222 for 4 vs Rajasthan Royals
Marcus Stoinis scored an unbeaten 62 off 22 balls to help Punjab Kings post 222 for 4 against Rajasthan Royals in an IPL 2026 match. Rajasthan Royals chased down the target with four balls to spare, thanks to a 52* off 26 by Donovan Ferreira and 31* by Shubham Dubey. Despite strong performances from Stoinis and Prabhsimran Singh, PBKS' bowling couldn't defend the total after Chahal and Brar were taken out of the attack.
- ▪Marcus Stoinis scored 62 not out off 22 balls, including six sixes, to power PBKS to 222 for 4.
- ▪Donovan Ferreira hit an unbeaten 52 off 26 balls and Shubham Dubey remained not out on 31 to guide RR to victory.
- ▪Yuzvendra Chahal took three wickets and Harpreet Brar conceded only 25 runs in his four overs.
- ▪RR needed 72 runs in the last six overs but successfully chased down the target with six wickets in hand.
- ▪Prabhsimran Singh scored a 35-ball half-century, supported by quick cameos from Priyansh Arya and Cooper Connolly.
Story provenance
Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record
inspect →
Story provenance
Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.
Record
| Original publisher | The Hindu |
| Canonical URL | https://www.thehindu.com/sport/cricket/ipl-2026-rajasthan-royals-punjab-kings/article70917053.ece |
| Publication time | Tue, 28 Apr 2026 21:57:48 +0530 |
| Retrieval time | 2026-04-28T16:37:43.353Z |
| Last seen | 2026-04-28T16:37:43.353Z |
| Headline source | Publisher (no WeSearch rewrite) |
| Excerpt source | publisher body |
| Excerpt method | First ~120 words (~800 chars) of extracted publisher body, fair-use limited. |
| Summary | WeSearch · cerebras-chat (WeSearch summarizer) |
| Summary source text | contentText |
| Citation coverage | Summary is a WeSearch-generated derivative; primary citation is the original publisher URL. |
| Cluster | _4MOfQrO_Ozf |
| Cluster logic | Grouped by semantic title/content similarity across sources within a rolling window. Same-publisher template collisions are excluded from coverage comparison. |
| Ranking reason | Story pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking. |
| Publisher visit | Yes — open original |
| Substitutes article? | No — link-out required for full text |
Rights status (four layers)
WeSearch handling by dimension
| Indexing | May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)? | Allowed |
| Snippet | May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown? | Allowed |
| AI summary | May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article? | Limited |
| Retrieval / RAG | May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation? | Not asserted |
| Model training | May the content be used to train AI models? | Not asserted |
| Commercial reuse | May the content be reused commercially? | Not permitted |
Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
Donovan Ferreira and Shubham Dubey combined to outdo Marcus Stoinis’ stunning knock as Rajasthan Royals broke Punjab Kings’ winning streak in IPL 2026 at the Maharaja Yadavindra Singh Stadium here on Tuesday.Royals needed 72 runs in the last six overs and finished the 223-run chase with four balls to spare and six wickets in hand to register their sixth win of the season.The pitch assisted the slower bowlers. But once Yuzvendra Chahal and Harpreet Brar finished their quota by the 14th over, Ferreira and Impact Player Shubham got RR back into the game by making use of the pace.While Ferreira slammed an unbeaten 52 off 26 deliveries (6x4, 3x6), Shubham remained unbeaten on 31 (12b, 3x4, 2x6).
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at The Hindu.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from The Hindu
