WeSearch

Jack Osbourne lashes out at ‘f–king insane’ trolls labeling him ‘grossly underweight’

·6 min read · 0 reactions · 0 comments · 33 views
Jack Osbourne lashes out at ‘f–king insane’ trolls labeling him ‘grossly underweight’
TL;DR · WeSearch summary

Jack Osbourne has responded to online trolls criticizing his weight loss, calling their comments 'f–king insane.' He insists that he has maintained the same weight since appearing on a reality show and attributes his weight loss to lifestyle changes. Osbourne expressed frustration over being criticized for both his previous weight and his current healthy weight.

Key facts
About this source

New York Post files mainly under news. We currently carry 11,003 of its stories.

Original article
Page Six
Read full at Page Six →

Story provenance

Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record
inspect →

Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.

Record

Original publisherPage Six
Canonical URLhttps://pagesix.com/2026/05/20/celebrity-news/jack-osbourne-lashes-out-at-f-king-insane-trolls-labeling-him-grossly-underweight/
Publication timeWed, 20 May 2026 09:15:17 -0400
Retrieval time2026-05-20T13:18:53.323Z
Last seen2026-05-20T13:28:43.105Z
Headline sourcePublisher (no WeSearch rewrite)
Excerpt sourcepublisher body
Excerpt methodFirst ~120 words (~800 chars) of extracted publisher body, fair-use limited.
SummaryWeSearch · cerebras-chat (WeSearch summarizer)
Summary source textcontentText
Citation coverageSummary is a WeSearch-generated derivative; primary citation is the original publisher URL.
ClusterCHpP3YAfbLcU
Cluster logicGrouped by semantic title/content similarity across sources within a rolling window. Same-publisher template collisions are excluded from coverage comparison.
Ranking reasonStory pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking.
Publisher visitYes — open original
Substitutes article?No — link-out required for full text

Rights status (four layers)

Publisher-declared
No publisher-confirmed rights record for this source yet.
Machine-readable
No source-specific machine-readable restriction detected beyond the public feed.
WeSearch interpretation
WeSearch declared handling (basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed). This is WeSearch policy, not a legal grant on the publisher's behalf.
Unknown
Retrieval and training permissions are not asserted unless the publisher confirms them.

WeSearch handling by dimension

Indexing May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)? Allowed
Snippet May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown? Allowed
AI summary May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article? Limited
Retrieval / RAG May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation? Not asserted
Model training May the content be used to train AI models? Not asserted
Commercial reuse May the content be reused commercially? Not permitted

Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.

Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand

Celebrity News Jack Osbourne lashes out at ‘f–king insane’ trolls labeling him ‘grossly underweight’ By Tamantha Ryan Published May 20, 2026, 9:15 a.m. ET See more of our coverage in your search results. Add Page Six on Google Jack Osbourne lashed out at “f–king insane” trolls who have criticized his weight loss. “I cannot believe I’m having to actually make this f–king video,” the reality star said in a fiery Instagram video Tuesday. “If I see one more article written about me saying how I’m ‘sick,’ I’m ‘grossly underweight’, [that I’m] ‘health crisis Jack’ … It’s f–king insane,” he added. 7 Jack Osbourne (seen above) slammed “f–king insane” trolls who criticized his weight loss.

Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at Page Six.

Anonymous · no account needed
Share 𝕏 Facebook Reddit LinkedIn Threads WhatsApp Bluesky Mastodon Email

Discussion

0 comments

More from Page Six