Local and GitHub Code Review TUI
tuicr is a TUI for code review with vim keybindings. Scroll a GitHub-style diff, leave line-level comments, then push a real PR review to GitHub, or copy structured markdown for your coding agent.
Hacker News (Newest) files mainly under programming. We currently carry 5,306 of its stories.
Story provenance
Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record
inspect →
Story provenance
Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.
Record
| Original publisher | Tuicr |
| Canonical URL | https://tuicr.dev/ |
| Publication time | Fri, 26 Jun 2026 06:30:05 +0000 |
| Retrieval time | 2026-06-26T06:37:29.198Z |
| Last seen | 2026-06-26T06:37:29.198Z |
| Headline source | Publisher (no WeSearch rewrite) |
| Excerpt source | publisher body |
| Excerpt method | First ~120 words (~800 chars) of extracted publisher body, fair-use limited. |
| Summary | None yet |
| Summary source text | contentText |
| Citation coverage | No WeSearch summary has been generated for this story yet. |
| Cluster | MtQf81JTh_AV |
| Cluster logic | Grouped by semantic title/content similarity across sources within a rolling window. Same-publisher template collisions are excluded from coverage comparison. |
| Ranking reason | Story pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking. |
| Publisher visit | Yes — open original |
| Substitutes article? | No — link-out required for full text |
Rights status (four layers)
WeSearch handling by dimension
| Indexing | May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)? | Allowed |
| Snippet | May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown? | Allowed |
| AI summary | May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article? | Limited |
| Retrieval / RAG | May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation? | Not asserted |
| Model training | May the content be used to train AI models? | Not asserted |
| Commercial reuse | May the content be reused commercially? | Not permitted |
Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
→GitHub team workflow :submit opens a picker (Comment, Approve, Request changes, or Draft). Inline comments land on the right lines as a real PR review; review-level comments become the summary. Requires gh authenticated to the repo. ⌘:submit
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at Tuicr.