NBA finals 2026 Game 1: New York Knicks v San Antonio Spurs – live
The NBA Finals Game 1 features the New York Knicks facing off against the San Antonio Spurs. As the second quarter progresses, the Spurs lead 31-28 with Wemby contributing two free throws. The Knicks struggle to score from the free-throw line, currently at 0% while the Spurs are 7-for-8.
- ▪The Spurs lead the game 31-28 in the second quarter.
- ▪Wemby has scored two free throws for the Spurs.
- ▪The Knicks have yet to score from the free-throw line, going 0-for-0.
6 outlets in our directory ran this story, first to last over 13 hours. Coverage spans 3 points on the political spectrum — 1 lean left, 2 centre, 2 right.
- ▪ How to watch San Antonio Spurs vs New York Knicks: FREE NBA Finals 2026 live streams, TV schedule, Game 1 — Tom's Guide
- ▪ NBA Finals kick off tonight — how to watch Knicks-Spurs Game 1 for free — Page Six
- ▪ How to watch Knicks vs. Spurs in 2026 NBA Finals Game 1 live for free — New York Post
- ▪ Knicks take on Spurs in Game 1 of legendary NBA Finals rematch — CBS News — Top
- ▪ NY Knicks Game Tonight: Channel, Time, Odds & Full NBA Finals Schedule vs. Spurs — Yahoo Sports
The Guardian — US files mainly under news. We currently carry 537 of its stories.
Story provenance
Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record
inspect →
Story provenance
Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.
Record
| Original publisher | The Guardian — US |
| Canonical URL | https://www.theguardian.com/sport/live/2026/jun/03/nba-finals-2026-game-1-new-york-knicks-san-antonio-spurs-live-score |
| Publication time | Thu, 04 Jun 2026 01:12:51 GMT |
| Retrieval time | 2026-06-04T01:25:03.252Z |
| Last seen | 2026-06-04T01:25:03.252Z |
| Headline source | Publisher (no WeSearch rewrite) |
| Excerpt source | publisher body |
| Excerpt method | First ~120 words (~800 chars) of extracted publisher body, fair-use limited. |
| Summary | WeSearch · cerebras-chat (WeSearch summarizer) |
| Summary source text | contentText |
| Citation coverage | Summary is a WeSearch-generated derivative; primary citation is the original publisher URL. |
| Cluster | ddHTMWO19otr · 11 stories |
| Cluster logic | Grouped by semantic title/content similarity across sources within a rolling window. Same-publisher template collisions are excluded from coverage comparison. |
| Ranking reason | Story pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking. |
| Publisher visit | Yes — open original |
| Substitutes article? | No — link-out required for full text |
Rights status (four layers)
WeSearch handling by dimension
| Indexing | May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)? | Allowed |
| Snippet | May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown? | Allowed |
| AI summary | May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article? | Limited |
| Retrieval / RAG | May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation? | Not asserted |
| Model training | May the content be used to train AI models? | Not asserted |
| Commercial reuse | May the content be reused commercially? | Not permitted |
Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
now21.24 EDTKnicks 28-31 Spurs, 8:03, 2nd qtr: Wemby hits two free throws. The Spurs are 7-for-8 from the line. The Knicks are 0-for-0, a 0% mark.Alvarado gets two for the Knicks. Anunoby gets a steal, but the Knicks can’t convert.Then there’s a miss. And a miss. And another miss.But the Knicks may finally get to the line as Wemby fouls Towns. The Spurs, outscored 9-4 so far in the quarter, will challenge the call.Share
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at The Guardian — US.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from The Guardian — US
