WeSearch

Oh No! I've invented SVG badly!

·4 min read · 0 reactions · 0 comments · 46 views
TL;DR · WeSearch summary

The author reflects on their attempt to create a new system for flag emojis inspired by Unicode's family emoji. Initially, the idea seemed simple, focusing on horizontal and vertical stripes with color modifiers. However, as the concept evolved, it became overly complex, resembling a graphics language that Unicode would likely reject.

Key facts
About this source

Hacker News (Newest) files mainly under programming. We currently carry 5,306 of its stories.

Original article
Billpg
Read full at Billpg →

Story provenance

Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record
inspect →

Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.

Record

Original publisherBillpg
Canonical URLhttps://owl.billpg.com/on-no-ive-invented-svg-badly/
Publication timeFri, 29 May 2026 06:26:54 +0000
Retrieval time2026-05-29T06:49:57.540Z
Last seen2026-05-29T06:49:57.540Z
Headline sourcePublisher (no WeSearch rewrite)
Excerpt sourcepublisher body
Excerpt methodFirst ~120 words (~800 chars) of extracted publisher body, fair-use limited.
SummaryWeSearch · cerebras-chat (WeSearch summarizer)
Summary source textcontentText
Citation coverageSummary is a WeSearch-generated derivative; primary citation is the original publisher URL.
ClusterwpQ5tYC1rKjW
Cluster logicGrouped by semantic title/content similarity across sources within a rolling window. Same-publisher template collisions are excluded from coverage comparison.
Ranking reasonStory pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking.
Publisher visitYes — open original
Substitutes article?No — link-out required for full text

Rights status (four layers)

Publisher-declared
No publisher-confirmed rights record for this source yet.
Machine-readable
No source-specific machine-readable restriction detected beyond the public feed.
WeSearch interpretation
WeSearch declared handling (basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed). This is WeSearch policy, not a legal grant on the publisher's behalf.
Unknown
Retrieval and training permissions are not asserted unless the publisher confirms them.

WeSearch handling by dimension

Indexing May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)? Allowed
Snippet May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown? Allowed
AI summary May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article? Limited
Retrieval / RAG May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation? Not asserted
Model training May the content be used to train AI models? Not asserted
Commercial reuse May the content be reused commercially? Not permitted

Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.

Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand

Posted on May 29, 2026 by billpgOn no! I’ve invented SVG badly! It started, as these things often do, with a tiny spark of inspiration. I was looking at the way Unicode builds those racially diverse family emoji. These use ZWJ sequences to glue together adults, children, and skin‑tone modifiers into a single little glyph. It’s clever, constrained, and surprisingly elegant. It gave me an idea. What if you could do the same thing for flags? Unicode already has national flag emojis along with 🏳️‍🌈, 🏳️‍⚧️, 🏴‍☠️, 🏁,🏳️,🏴,🚩 and the countries-in-our-hearts, 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿, 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿, 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿. But no more. The people in charge of assigning codes have decided this is too much of a geopolitical and culture-war nightmare so these are all the flags we’re going to get.

Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at Billpg.

Anonymous · no account needed
Share 𝕏 Facebook Reddit LinkedIn Threads WhatsApp Bluesky Mastodon Email

Discussion

0 comments

More from Billpg