Pete Davidson’s pals deny claims he’s neglecting Elsie Hewitt and baby after model posts and deletes shocking allegations
Pete Davidson's friends have defended him against claims made by his ex, Elsie Hewitt, regarding his support for their infant daughter. A source stated that Davidson is financially supporting Hewitt and their child despite their recent breakup. The allegations of neglect were described as false, with emphasis on Davidson's commitment to being a good father.
- ▪Elsie Hewitt publicly asked for help caring for their infant daughter after news of their split.
- ▪A source claimed that Pete Davidson is paying for all living expenses and health insurance for Hewitt and their child.
- ▪The insider emphasized that Davidson is committed to being a supportive father despite personal disagreements.
New York Post files mainly under news. We currently carry 11,060 of its stories.
Story provenance
Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record
inspect →
Story provenance
Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.
Record
| Original publisher | Page Six |
| Canonical URL | https://pagesix.com/2026/05/17/celebrity-news/pete-davidsons-pals-deny-claims-comedian-is-neglecting-ex-elsie-hewitt-and-baby/ |
| Publication time | Sun, 17 May 2026 16:21:59 -0400 |
| Retrieval time | 2026-05-17T20:23:20.959Z |
| Last seen | 2026-05-17T20:55:56.623Z |
| Headline source | Publisher (no WeSearch rewrite) |
| Excerpt source | publisher body |
| Excerpt method | First ~120 words (~800 chars) of extracted publisher body, fair-use limited. |
| Summary | WeSearch · cerebras-chat (WeSearch summarizer) |
| Summary source text | contentText |
| Citation coverage | Summary is a WeSearch-generated derivative; primary citation is the original publisher URL. |
| Cluster | P_HEkeybcVFk |
| Cluster logic | Grouped by semantic title/content similarity across sources within a rolling window. Same-publisher template collisions are excluded from coverage comparison. |
| Ranking reason | Story pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking. |
| Publisher visit | Yes — open original |
| Substitutes article? | No — link-out required for full text |
Rights status (four layers)
WeSearch handling by dimension
| Indexing | May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)? | Allowed |
| Snippet | May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown? | Allowed |
| AI summary | May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article? | Limited |
| Retrieval / RAG | May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation? | Not asserted |
| Model training | May the content be used to train AI models? | Not asserted |
| Commercial reuse | May the content be reused commercially? | Not permitted |
Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
Celebrity News exclusive Pete Davidson’s pals deny claims he’s neglecting Elsie Hewitt and baby after model posts and deletes shocking allegations By Audrey Rock Published May 17, 2026, 4:21 p.m. ET Pete Davidson’s pals are coming to his defense after his ex Elsie Hewitt publicly asked for help caring for their infant daughter days after news of their split surfaced. A source close to the former couple exclusively told Page Six on Saturday that “Pete has been paying for everything related to Elsie and Scottie,” including “the rent, their living expenses, their health insurance.” The insider added of the “Bupkis” star, “They may have split but all he wants is for Elsie to be happy and in a good place.” “His main priority right now is making sure that Elsie and Scottie are looked after, so…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at Page Six.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from Page Six
