Rajat Patidar admits SRH's 255 was 'too much' for RCB in Hyderabad clash
Rajat Patidar acknowledged that Sunrisers Hyderabad's total of 255 runs was challenging for Royal Challengers Bengaluru. Despite RCB scoring 200 runs, they lost the match by 55 runs but still topped the league table. Patidar credited SRH's effective batting and bowling strategies as key factors in the game's outcome.
- ▪Sunrisers Hyderabad scored 255 runs in their IPL match against Royal Challengers Bengaluru.
- ▪RCB managed to score 200 runs but lost the match by 55 runs.
- ▪Despite the loss, RCB finished at the top of the league table with a net run rate of 0.783.
2 outlets in our directory ran this story, first to last over 6 hours. All of the coverage we found sits in one bucket: centre. That one-sidedness is itself worth noticing.
- ▪ Rajat Patidar admits SRH's 255 was 'too much' for RCB in Hyderabad clash — Times of India — Top
Yahoo Sports files mainly under sports. We currently carry 16,505 of its stories.
Story provenance
Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record
inspect →
Story provenance
Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.
Record
| Original publisher | Yahoo Sports |
| Canonical URL | https://sports.yahoo.com/articles/rajat-patidar-admits-srhs-255-000900825.html |
| Publication time | Sat, 23 May 2026 00:09:00 +0000 |
| Retrieval time | 2026-05-23T00:32:03.512Z |
| Last seen | 2026-05-23T00:32:03.512Z |
| Headline source | Publisher (no WeSearch rewrite) |
| Excerpt source | publisher body |
| Excerpt method | First ~120 words (~800 chars) of extracted publisher body, fair-use limited. |
| Summary | WeSearch · cerebras-chat (WeSearch summarizer) |
| Summary source text | contentText |
| Citation coverage | Summary is a WeSearch-generated derivative; primary citation is the original publisher URL. |
| Cluster | oq6Je5rSrNM4 · 4 stories |
| Cluster logic | Grouped by semantic title/content similarity across sources within a rolling window. Same-publisher template collisions are excluded from coverage comparison. |
| Ranking reason | Story pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking. |
| Publisher visit | Yes — open original |
| Substitutes article? | No — link-out required for full text |
Rights status (four layers)
WeSearch handling by dimension
| Indexing | May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)? | Allowed |
| Snippet | May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown? | Allowed |
| AI summary | May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article? | Limited |
| Retrieval / RAG | May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation? | Not asserted |
| Model training | May the content be used to train AI models? | Not asserted |
| Commercial reuse | May the content be reused commercially? | Not permitted |
Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
{"@context":"http://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","mainEntityOfPage":"https://sports.yahoo.com/articles/rajat-patidar-admits-srhs-255-000900825.html","headline":"Rajat Patidar admits SRH's 255 was 'too much' for RCB in Hyderabad clash","datePublished":"2026-05-23T00:09:00.000Z","dateModified":"2026-05-23T00:09:00.000Z","keywords":["Sunrisers Hyderabad","Rajat Patidar","Pat Cummins","Royal Challengers Bengaluru","Ishan Kishan","Heinrich Klaasen","Abhishek Sharma"],"description":"Rajat Patidar admitted that there were “a lot of runs” on the board after Sunrisers Hyderabad piled up 255/4 against Royal Challengers Bengaluru in their IPL...","publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Yahoo…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at Yahoo Sports.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from Yahoo Sports
