Rethinking Uncertainty Evaluation in Large Language Models
What we actually need is for LLM confidence estimates to satisfy the conditions required of coherent probabilistic beliefs. We formalize these conditions along three axes (structural coherence, faithfulness, and usefulness) and operationalize them as the C1 metrics. RLHF and chain-of-thought improve usefulness metrics without restoring coherence.
- ▪What we actually need is for LLM confidence estimates to satisfy the conditions required of coherent probabilistic beliefs.
- ▪We formalize these conditions along three axes (structural coherence, faithfulness, and usefulness) and operationalize them as the C1 metrics.
- ▪RLHF and chain-of-thought improve usefulness metrics without restoring coherence.
2 outlets in our directory ran this story, first to last over 32 hours. All of the coverage we found sits in one bucket: centre. That one-sidedness is itself worth noticing.
- ▪ Language Model Hallucination Evaluation with GraphEval — KDnuggets
arXiv cs.AI files mainly under ai research. We currently carry 1,128 of its stories.
Story provenance
Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record
inspect →
Story provenance
Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.
Record
| Original publisher | arXiv.org |
| Canonical URL | https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.19367 |
| Publication time | Thu, 23 Jul 2026 00:00:00 -0400 |
| Retrieval time | 2026-07-23T04:57:27.757Z |
| Last seen | 2026-07-23T04:57:27.757Z |
| Headline source | Publisher (no WeSearch rewrite) |
| Excerpt source | publisher body |
| Excerpt method | First ~120 words (~800 chars) of extracted publisher body, fair-use limited. |
| Summary | WeSearch · cerebras-chat (WeSearch summarizer) |
| Summary source text | contentText |
| Citation coverage | Summary is a WeSearch-generated derivative; primary citation is the original publisher URL. |
| Cluster | FCS2juLoqqfF · 3 stories |
| Cluster logic | Grouped by semantic title/content similarity across sources within a rolling window. Same-publisher template collisions are excluded from coverage comparison. |
| Ranking reason | Story pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking. |
| Publisher visit | Yes — open original |
| Substitutes article? | No — link-out required for full text |
Rights status (four layers)
WeSearch handling by dimension
| Indexing | May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)? | Allowed |
| Snippet | May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown? | Allowed |
| AI summary | May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article? | Limited |
| Retrieval / RAG | May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation? | Not asserted |
| Model training | May the content be used to train AI models? | Not asserted |
| Commercial reuse | May the content be reused commercially? | Not permitted |
Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence arXiv:2607.19367 (cs) [Submitted on 11 Jun 2026] Title:Rethinking Uncertainty Evaluation in Large Language Models Authors:Krish Matta, Atharv Naphade, Andy Zou View a PDF of the paper titled Rethinking Uncertainty Evaluation in Large Language Models, by Krish Matta and 2 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Calibration is the primary criterion for evaluating LLM confidence, but it is insufficient: it admits trivially incoherent estimators, depends on the evaluation distribution, and does not test the extent to which the estimation can be interpreted as a consistent, underlying probability function. What we actually need is for LLM confidence estimates to satisfy the conditions required of coherent probabilistic beliefs.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at arXiv.org.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from arXiv.org
