Rich-text editing was built for humans. Now we're rebuilding it around AI
Rich-text editing was originally designed for human use, but it is now being rebuilt around artificial intelligence. This shift is expected to change the way people interact with text editors, such as Docs or Word. The rebuilding process aims to adapt the editing experience to the capabilities and limitations of AI systems.
- ▪Rich-text editors were built for human writing and collaboration.
- ▪The editors' primitives were designed for human use, not AI interaction.
- ▪The rebuilding process is focused on adapting the editing experience to AI capabilities.
Hacker News (AI / LLM) files mainly under ai. We currently carry 3,336 of its stories.
Story provenance
Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record
inspect →
Story provenance
Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.
Record
| Original publisher | X (formerly Twitter) |
| Canonical URL | https://twitter.com/khudonogov/status/2059633069171101712 |
| Publication time | Wed, 27 May 2026 13:55:53 +0000 |
| Retrieval time | 2026-05-27T14:13:01.289Z |
| Last seen | 2026-05-27T14:13:01.289Z |
| Headline source | Publisher (no WeSearch rewrite) |
| Excerpt source | publisher body |
| Excerpt method | First ~120 words (~800 chars) of extracted publisher body, fair-use limited. |
| Summary | WeSearch · cerebras-chat (WeSearch summarizer) |
| Summary source text | contentText |
| Citation coverage | Summary is a WeSearch-generated derivative; primary citation is the original publisher URL. |
| Cluster | goGO8LHYHbHL |
| Cluster logic | Grouped by semantic title/content similarity across sources within a rolling window. Same-publisher template collisions are excluded from coverage comparison. |
| Ranking reason | Story pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking. |
| Publisher visit | Yes — open original |
| Substitutes article? | No — link-out required for full text |
Rights status (four layers)
WeSearch handling by dimension
| Indexing | May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)? | Allowed |
| Snippet | May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown? | Allowed |
| AI summary | May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article? | Limited |
| Retrieval / RAG | May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation? | Not asserted |
| Model training | May the content be used to train AI models? | Not asserted |
| Commercial reuse | May the content be reused commercially? | Not permitted |
Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
Roman@khudonogovArticleRich-text editing was built for humans. Now we’re rebuilding it around AI Nearly every primitive in every rich-text editor you've ever used (whatever you prefer typing in, probably Docs or Word) was built for one of two things: writing on your own, or writing with...1:49 PM · May 27, 2026136Views:host{display:inline-block;direction:ltr;white-space:nowrap;line-height:var(--number-flow-char-height, 1em) !important}span{display:inline-block}:host([data-will-change]) span{will-change:transform}.number,.digit{padding:round(nearest, calc(var(--number-flow-mask-height, 0.25em) / 2), 1px) 0}.symbol{white-space:pre}1number-flow-react > span{font-kerning:none;display:inline-block;line-height:var(--number-flow-char-height, 1em) !important;padding:calc(round(nearest,…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at X (formerly Twitter).
Discussion
0 commentsMore from X (formerly Twitter)
