WeSearch

Show HN: Agenda Intel MD – schemas and CLI to audit LLM strategic-risk briefs

·7 min read · 0 reactions · 0 comments · 29 views
Show HN: Agenda Intel MD – schemas and CLI to audit LLM strategic-risk briefs
TL;DR · WeSearch summary

Agenda Intelligence MD is an open-source toolkit designed to audit and validate the structure of AI-generated strategic-risk briefs, ensuring they meet rigorous evidence and reasoning standards. It provides a protocol, JSON schemas, CLI tools, and an MCP server to help AI agents produce auditable, evidence-backed outputs rather than plausible-sounding summaries. The toolkit targets engineers building policy, geopolitical risk, and regulatory intelligence agents that must withstand analyst review.

Key facts
About this source

Hacker News (AI / LLM) files mainly under ai. We currently carry 3,366 of its stories.

Original article
GitHub
Read full at GitHub →

Story provenance

Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record
inspect →

Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.

Record

Original publisherGitHub
Canonical URLhttps://github.com/vassiliylakhonin/agenda-intelligence-md
Publication timeSat, 16 May 2026 15:12:02 +0000
Retrieval time2026-05-16T15:15:18.844Z
Last seen2026-05-16T15:15:18.844Z
Headline sourcePublisher (no WeSearch rewrite)
Excerpt sourcepublisher body
Excerpt methodFirst ~120 words (~800 chars) of extracted publisher body, fair-use limited.
SummaryWeSearch · cerebras-chat (WeSearch summarizer)
Summary source textcontentText
Citation coverageSummary is a WeSearch-generated derivative; primary citation is the original publisher URL.
ClusteroiY8nJXzNQQs
Cluster logicGrouped by semantic title/content similarity across sources within a rolling window. Same-publisher template collisions are excluded from coverage comparison.
Ranking reasonStory pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking.
Publisher visitYes — open original
Substitutes article?No — link-out required for full text

Rights status (four layers)

Publisher-declared
No publisher-confirmed rights record for this source yet.
Machine-readable
No source-specific machine-readable restriction detected beyond the public feed.
WeSearch interpretation
WeSearch declared handling (basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed). This is WeSearch policy, not a legal grant on the publisher's behalf.
Unknown
Retrieval and training permissions are not asserted unless the publisher confirms them.

WeSearch handling by dimension

Indexing May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)? Allowed
Snippet May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown? Allowed
AI summary May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article? Limited
Retrieval / RAG May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation? Not asserted
Model training May the content be used to train AI models? Not asserted
Commercial reuse May the content be reused commercially? Not permitted

Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.

Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand

Agenda Intelligence MD CI / MCP / EVIDENCE-AUDIT LAYER FOR STRATEGIC INTELLIGENCE AGENTS — protocol, JSON schemas, CLI and MCP server for validating, scoring and auditing the structure of strategic-risk agent output. The evidence-discipline surface for markdown-first reasoning skills (Global Think Tank Analyst, Central Asia + Caspian, Gulf + Middle East). Open-source. Evidence & eval layer for strategic intelligence agents. A protocol, JSON-schema set, CLI, and MCP-compatible toolkit that helps AI agents move from unsupported summaries to auditable strategic-risk briefs: what changed why it matters what is evidence-backed what is uncertain who gains or loses leverage what scenarios are plausible what to watch next It is built for engineers shipping policy, sanctions, regulation,…

Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at GitHub.

Anonymous · no account needed
Share 𝕏 Facebook Reddit LinkedIn Threads WhatsApp Bluesky Mastodon Email

Discussion

0 comments

More from GitHub