WeSearch

Show HN: I build a tool to encourage before reviewing code, review intents

·6 min read · 0 reactions · 0 comments · 38 views
Show HN: I build a tool to encourage before reviewing code, review intents
TL;DR · WeSearch summary

Mainline is a new tool designed to enhance code review processes by focusing on reviewing the intent behind code changes. It provides a memory layer that captures important context and decisions made prior to code edits, which is crucial in a landscape where AI agents generate code quickly. By making intent reviewable before code review, Mainline aims to prevent issues that arise from misunderstanding the rationale behind changes.

Key facts
About this source

Hacker News (Newest) files mainly under programming. We currently carry 5,306 of its stories.

Original article
GitHub
Read full at GitHub →

Story provenance

Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record
inspect →

Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.

Record

Original publisherGitHub
Canonical URLhttps://github.com/mainline-org/mainline
Publication timeSat, 23 May 2026 13:54:33 +0000
Retrieval time2026-05-23T14:07:26.892Z
Last seen2026-05-23T14:07:26.892Z
Headline sourcePublisher (no WeSearch rewrite)
Excerpt sourcepublisher body
Excerpt methodFirst ~120 words (~800 chars) of extracted publisher body, fair-use limited.
SummaryWeSearch · cerebras-chat (WeSearch summarizer)
Summary source textcontentText
Citation coverageSummary is a WeSearch-generated derivative; primary citation is the original publisher URL.
ClusterOhX4VH5-3RmR
Cluster logicGrouped by semantic title/content similarity across sources within a rolling window. Same-publisher template collisions are excluded from coverage comparison.
Ranking reasonStory pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking.
Publisher visitYes — open original
Substitutes article?No — link-out required for full text

Rights status (four layers)

Publisher-declared
No publisher-confirmed rights record for this source yet.
Machine-readable
No source-specific machine-readable restriction detected beyond the public feed.
WeSearch interpretation
WeSearch declared handling (basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed). This is WeSearch policy, not a legal grant on the publisher's behalf.
Unknown
Retrieval and training permissions are not asserted unless the publisher confirms them.

WeSearch handling by dimension

Indexing May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)? Allowed
Snippet May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown? Allowed
AI summary May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article? Limited
Retrieval / RAG May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation? Not asserted
Model training May the content be used to train AI models? Not asserted
Commercial reuse May the content be reused commercially? Not permitted

Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.

Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand

Mainline Website: https://mainline.sh Hosted Hub: https://mainline.sh/hub/ Detailed reference: docs/reference.md 中文版本: README.zh.md We have code review. Now we need intent review. Mainline is a Git-native memory layer for coding agents. It gives agents and reviewers repo memory before the diff: prior decisions, constraints, abandoned approaches, validation notes, and related in-flight work. AI agents make code cheap to produce and harder to review. Mainline makes the intent reviewable before the generated code lands. Review the intent before you review the code. The Problem Code review was built for a world where humans wrote most of the code. The diff was expensive, so it was usually small enough for reviewers to infer the intent. Agent work changes that.

Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at GitHub.

Anonymous · no account needed
Share 𝕏 Facebook Reddit LinkedIn Threads WhatsApp Bluesky Mastodon Email

Discussion

0 comments

More from GitHub