Social networks outsmart cognitive biases: How herding in networks makes populations more rational
Researchers examined how anchoring bias affects decision making in groups versus individuals. In an experiment with 1,600 participants, those who exchanged estimates within peer networks reduced their errors by about 22%, while solitary participants showed no improvement. The findings suggest that egalitarian social influence can mitigate anchoring bias and improve collective rationality.
- ▪Participants were first given either a low (118) or high (353) anchor before estimating the number of pennies in a pile.
- ▪Those working in connected networks exchanged their guesses with peers and then revised their estimates, leading to a 22% reduction in error.
- ▪Participants who worked alone were allowed to revise their guesses but received no peer information, and their accuracy did not improve across rounds.
- ▪The study was conducted by Damon Centola and doctoral candidate Calvin Isch and published in the Journal of Social Computing.
Phys.org files mainly under science. We currently carry 1,272 of its stories.
Story provenance
Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record
inspect →
Story provenance
Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.
Record
| Original publisher | Phys.org |
| Canonical URL | https://phys.org/news/2026-06-social-networks-outsmart-cognitive-biases.html |
| Publication time | Wed, 03 Jun 2026 16:00:01 EDT |
| Retrieval time | 2026-06-03T20:28:28.991Z |
| Last seen | 2026-06-03T20:28:31.554Z |
| Headline source | Publisher (no WeSearch rewrite) |
| Excerpt source | publisher body |
| Excerpt method | First ~120 words (~800 chars) of extracted publisher body, fair-use limited. |
| Summary | WeSearch · cerebras-chat (WeSearch summarizer) |
| Summary source text | contentText |
| Citation coverage | Summary is a WeSearch-generated derivative; primary citation is the original publisher URL. |
| Cluster | RsrYcZQXZROC |
| Cluster logic | Grouped by semantic title/content similarity across sources within a rolling window. Same-publisher template collisions are excluded from coverage comparison. |
| Ranking reason | Story pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking. |
| Publisher visit | Yes — open original |
| Substitutes article? | No — link-out required for full text |
Rights status (four layers)
WeSearch handling by dimension
| Indexing | May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)? | Allowed |
| Snippet | May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown? | Allowed |
| AI summary | May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article? | Limited |
| Retrieval / RAG | May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation? | Not asserted |
| Model training | May the content be used to train AI models? | Not asserted |
| Commercial reuse | May the content be reused commercially? | Not permitted |
Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
June 3, 2026 Social networks outsmart cognitive biases: How herding in networks makes populations more rational by Mandira Banerjee, University of Pennsylvania edited by Stephanie Baum, reviewed by Andrew Zinin Stephanie Baum Scientific Editor Meet our editorial team Behind our editorial process Andrew Zinin Lead Editor Meet our editorial team Behind our editorial process Editors' notes This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies. Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility: fact-checked trusted source proofread The GIST Add as preferred source Credit: CC0 Public Domain In 2010, the New York City-based restaurant Serendipity 3 revealed its $69 hot dog, winning the Guinness World Record for the…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at Phys.org.