Spencer Pratt defends baker who lost everything in LA fires allegedly bullied by Jimmy Kimmel’s relative for campaign cookies
Spencer Pratt has publicly defended a baker, Daniela Romano, who lost her home in the Palisades Fire and faced backlash for selling cookies with a pro-Pratt message. The controversy arose after Carly Kimmel, a relative of Jimmy Kimmel, allegedly threatened to boycott the bakery over the cookies. Pratt criticized the Kimmel family for their actions and emphasized the importance of supporting those affected by the fire.
- ▪Spencer Pratt defended baker Daniela Romano, who lost everything in the Palisades Fire.
- ▪Romano's cookies featuring a 'Vote Pratt' emblem drew criticism from Carly Kimmel, Jimmy Kimmel's sister-in-law.
- ▪Pratt urged the Kimmel family to support fire victims and buy the cookies as a form of apology.
New York Post files mainly under news. We currently carry 10,965 of its stories.
Story provenance
Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record
inspect →
Story provenance
Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.
Record
| Original publisher | California Post |
| Canonical URL | https://nypost.com/2026/05/22/us-news/spencer-pratt-defends-baker-allegedly-bullied-by-jimmy-kimmels-relative-for-campaign-cookies/ |
| Publication time | Fri, 22 May 2026 21:09:44 -0400 |
| Retrieval time | 2026-05-23T01:12:03.658Z |
| Last seen | 2026-05-23T01:26:36.865Z |
| Headline source | Publisher (no WeSearch rewrite) |
| Excerpt source | publisher body |
| Excerpt method | First ~120 words (~800 chars) of extracted publisher body, fair-use limited. |
| Summary | WeSearch · cerebras-chat (WeSearch summarizer) |
| Summary source text | contentText |
| Citation coverage | Summary is a WeSearch-generated derivative; primary citation is the original publisher URL. |
| Cluster | ZbzvANvUqvZO |
| Cluster logic | Grouped by semantic title/content similarity across sources within a rolling window. Same-publisher template collisions are excluded from coverage comparison. |
| Ranking reason | Story pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking. |
| Publisher visit | Yes — open original |
| Substitutes article? | No — link-out required for full text |
Rights status (four layers)
WeSearch handling by dimension
| Indexing | May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)? | Allowed |
| Snippet | May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown? | Allowed |
| AI summary | May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article? | Limited |
| Retrieval / RAG | May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation? | Not asserted |
| Model training | May the content be used to train AI models? | Not asserted |
| Commercial reuse | May the content be reused commercially? | Not permitted |
Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
Politics Spencer Pratt defends baker who lost everything in LA fires allegedly bullied by liberal A-lister’s relative for campaign cookies By Ross O'Keefe Published May 22, 2026, 9:09 p.m. ET See more of our coverage in your search results. Add The California Post on Google Spencer Pratt is coming to the defense of a baker who lost everything in the Palisades Fire after she was allegedly attacked by Jimmy Kimmel’s relative for selling pro-Pratt cookies. Daniela Romano works out of the bakery at Vicente Foods in Brentwood started selling cookies with a “Vote Pratt” emblem on them earlier this week. The baked goods, a sugar cookie with decorated with the pro-Pratt design started to gain popularity, selling in masses and drawing ire from Pratt’s critics.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at California Post.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from California Post
