Supreme Court bars posting, uploading court proceedings on social media without prior permission
The Supreme Court has barred the posting, reposting, or uploading of audio-video recordings of court proceedings on social media without prior permission. This decision was made in response to a plea raising concerns about the misuse of live-streaming and circulation of videos of court proceedings on social media. The court has sought responses from the Centre and others on the matter, emphasizing the need for regulation of such content.
- ▪The Supreme Court has prohibited the sharing of court proceedings on social media without prior permission from the secretary general or registrar general.
- ▪The decision was made in response to a plea highlighting the misuse of videos of court proceedings on social media and other digital platforms.
- ▪Senior advocate Vikas Singh and Solicitor General Tushar Mehta agreed on the need for regulation of such content.
The Hindu — Top publishes from India and files mainly under world. We currently carry 7,904 of its stories.
Story provenance
Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record
inspect →
Story provenance
Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.
Record
| Original publisher | The Hindu — Top |
| Canonical URL | https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/supreme-court-bars-posting-uploading-court-proceedings-on-social-media-without-prior-permission/article71261594.ece |
| Publication time | Fri, 24 Jul 2026 14:43:41 +0530 |
| Retrieval time | 2026-07-24T09:22:35.386Z |
| Last seen | 2026-07-24T09:22:35.386Z |
| Headline source | Publisher (no WeSearch rewrite) |
| Excerpt source | publisher body |
| Excerpt method | First ~120 words (~800 chars) of extracted publisher body, fair-use limited. |
| Summary | WeSearch · cerebras-chat (WeSearch summarizer) |
| Summary source text | contentText |
| Citation coverage | Summary is a WeSearch-generated derivative; primary citation is the original publisher URL. |
| Cluster | viHJGyiEeHj_ |
| Cluster logic | Grouped by semantic title/content similarity across sources within a rolling window. Same-publisher template collisions are excluded from coverage comparison. |
| Ranking reason | Story pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking. |
| Publisher visit | Yes — open original |
| Substitutes article? | No — link-out required for full text |
Rights status (four layers)
WeSearch handling by dimension
| Indexing | May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)? | Allowed |
| Snippet | May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown? | Allowed |
| AI summary | May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article? | Limited |
| Retrieval / RAG | May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation? | Not asserted |
| Model training | May the content be used to train AI models? | Not asserted |
| Commercial reuse | May the content be reused commercially? | Not permitted |
Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
The Supreme Court on Friday (July 24, 2026) barred posting, reposting or uploading of audio-video recordings of court proceedings on social media and other digital platforms without prior permission of the concerned secretary general of the apex court or the registrar generals of the high courts.A Bench of Chief Justice Surya Kant and Justices Joymalya Bagchi and V. Mohana also sought responses from the Centre and others on a plea raising the misuse of live-streaming and circulation of videos of court proceedings on social media.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at The Hindu — Top.