Tencent WorkBuddy Bench – Agentic Coding Leaderboard
GLM-5.2’s two Security leads are paid for in tokens (30–31k per run on both harnesses), and its 77.06 on Code under Claude Code costs 22.0k against GPT-5.5’s 8.7k; the smallest Claude Code point on the Code chart — Claude Opus 4.8 at 4.7k — comes from its modified-instruction run (see the leaderboard notes). Turns count unique assistant messages including subagent activity; output tokens come from each run’s final usage.
- ▪GLM-5.2’s two Security leads are paid for in tokens (30–31k per run on both harnesses), and its 77.06 on Code under Claude Code costs 22.0k against GPT-5.5’s 8.7k; the smallest Claude Code point on the Code chart — Claude Opus 4.8 at 4.7k —
- ▪Turns count unique assistant messages including subagent activity; output tokens come from each run’s final usage.
Hacker News (Newest) files mainly under programming. We currently carry 5,306 of its stories.
Story provenance
Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record
inspect →
Story provenance
Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.
Record
| Original publisher | Workbuddybench |
| Canonical URL | https://workbuddybench.com/index.html |
| Publication time | Fri, 24 Jul 2026 02:18:47 +0000 |
| Retrieval time | 2026-07-24T02:29:49.591Z |
| Last seen | 2026-07-24T02:29:49.591Z |
| Headline source | Publisher (no WeSearch rewrite) |
| Excerpt source | publisher body |
| Excerpt method | First ~120 words (~800 chars) of extracted publisher body, fair-use limited. |
| Summary | WeSearch · cerebras-chat (WeSearch summarizer) |
| Summary source text | contentText |
| Citation coverage | Summary is a WeSearch-generated derivative; primary citation is the original publisher URL. |
| Cluster | JqedrJUIIUjU |
| Cluster logic | Grouped by semantic title/content similarity across sources within a rolling window. Same-publisher template collisions are excluded from coverage comparison. |
| Ranking reason | Story pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking. |
| Publisher visit | Yes — open original |
| Substitutes article? | No — link-out required for full text |
Rights status (four layers)
WeSearch handling by dimension
| Indexing | May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)? | Allowed |
| Snippet | May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown? | Allowed |
| AI summary | May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article? | Limited |
| Retrieval / RAG | May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation? | Not asserted |
| Model training | May the content be used to train AI models? | Not asserted |
| Commercial reuse | May the content be reused commercially? | Not permitted |
Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
01 Key Takeaways核心结论 No single model dominates — column leadership splits across subsets and harnesses: Claude Opus 4.8 leads five of the eight scored columns (Code on both harnesses 74.43 / 77.90, Web on both harnesses 68.14 / 69.86, Office on CodeBuddy Code 82.37), GLM-5.2 two (Security 76.32 / 80.86 on both), GPT-5.5 one (Office 86.05 on Claude Code).没有一家通吃:各列榜首分散在不同子集与 harness 之间:Claude Opus 4.8 拿下八个计分列中的五个(Code 双 harness 74.43 / 77.90、Web 双 harness 68.14 / 69.86、CodeBuddy Code 下 Office 82.37),GLM-5.2 两个(Security 双 harness 76.32 / 80.86),GPT-5.5 一个(Claude Code 下 Office 86.05)。 An open-weight model holds its own: GLM-5.2 tops Security under both harnesses — two of the eight columns — and stays within a point of the Code lead under Claude Code; open-weight competitiveness here is…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at Workbuddybench.