WeSearch

Tencent WorkBuddy Bench – Agentic Coding Leaderboard

·3 min read · 0 reactions · 0 comments · 12 views
TL;DR · WeSearch summary

GLM-5.2’s two Security leads are paid for in tokens (30–31k per run on both harnesses), and its 77.06 on Code under Claude Code costs 22.0k against GPT-5.5’s 8.7k; the smallest Claude Code point on the Code chart — Claude Opus 4.8 at 4.7k — comes from its modified-instruction run (see the leaderboard notes). Turns count unique assistant messages including subagent activity; output tokens come from each run’s final usage.

Key facts
About this source

Hacker News (Newest) files mainly under programming. We currently carry 5,306 of its stories.

Original article
Workbuddybench
Read full at Workbuddybench →

Story provenance

Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record
inspect →

Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.

Record

Original publisherWorkbuddybench
Canonical URLhttps://workbuddybench.com/index.html
Publication timeFri, 24 Jul 2026 02:18:47 +0000
Retrieval time2026-07-24T02:29:49.591Z
Last seen2026-07-24T02:29:49.591Z
Headline sourcePublisher (no WeSearch rewrite)
Excerpt sourcepublisher body
Excerpt methodFirst ~120 words (~800 chars) of extracted publisher body, fair-use limited.
SummaryWeSearch · cerebras-chat (WeSearch summarizer)
Summary source textcontentText
Citation coverageSummary is a WeSearch-generated derivative; primary citation is the original publisher URL.
ClusterJqedrJUIIUjU
Cluster logicGrouped by semantic title/content similarity across sources within a rolling window. Same-publisher template collisions are excluded from coverage comparison.
Ranking reasonStory pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking.
Publisher visitYes — open original
Substitutes article?No — link-out required for full text

Rights status (four layers)

Publisher-declared
No publisher-confirmed rights record for this source yet.
Machine-readable
No source-specific machine-readable restriction detected beyond the public feed.
WeSearch interpretation
WeSearch declared handling (basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed). This is WeSearch policy, not a legal grant on the publisher's behalf.
Unknown
Retrieval and training permissions are not asserted unless the publisher confirms them.

WeSearch handling by dimension

Indexing May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)? Allowed
Snippet May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown? Allowed
AI summary May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article? Limited
Retrieval / RAG May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation? Not asserted
Model training May the content be used to train AI models? Not asserted
Commercial reuse May the content be reused commercially? Not permitted

Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.

Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand

01 Key Takeaways核心结论 No single model dominates — column leadership splits across subsets and harnesses: Claude Opus 4.8 leads five of the eight scored columns (Code on both harnesses 74.43 / 77.90, Web on both harnesses 68.14 / 69.86, Office on CodeBuddy Code 82.37), GLM-5.2 two (Security 76.32 / 80.86 on both), GPT-5.5 one (Office 86.05 on Claude Code).没有一家通吃:各列榜首分散在不同子集与 harness 之间:Claude Opus 4.8 拿下八个计分列中的五个(Code 双 harness 74.43 / 77.90、Web 双 harness 68.14 / 69.86、CodeBuddy Code 下 Office 82.37),GLM-5.2 两个(Security 双 harness 76.32 / 80.86),GPT-5.5 一个(Claude Code 下 Office 86.05)。 An open-weight model holds its own: GLM-5.2 tops Security under both harnesses — two of the eight columns — and stays within a point of the Code lead under Claude Code; open-weight competitiveness here is…

Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at Workbuddybench.

Anonymous · no account needed
Share 𝕏 Facebook Reddit LinkedIn Threads WhatsApp Bluesky Mastodon Email

Discussion

0 comments

More from Workbuddybench