The AI visibility checklist I used on my own agency site
The article discusses an AI visibility checklist created by Dmitry Kargaev for his agency website. It emphasizes the importance of entity clarity and machine-readable context for AI systems to effectively understand and recommend services. Kargaev outlines specific changes made to his site to improve its visibility and ensure accurate representation by AI models.
- ▪Kargaev found that many recommended AI visibility consultants lacked clear, machine-readable information about their services.
- ▪He emphasizes that SEO is essential but not sufficient; AI models require clear entity definitions to provide accurate answers.
- ▪The checklist includes steps such as defining the entity in a single sentence and making services and pricing unambiguous.
DEV.to (Top) files mainly under programming. We currently carry 4,924 of its stories.
Story provenance
Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record
inspect →
Story provenance
Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.
Record
| Original publisher | DEV.to (Top) |
| Canonical URL | https://dev.to/deeflect/the-ai-visibility-checklist-i-used-on-my-own-agency-site-2247 |
| Publication time | Wed, 20 May 2026 11:30:09 +0000 |
| Retrieval time | 2026-05-20T11:35:02.440Z |
| Last seen | 2026-05-20T11:35:02.440Z |
| Headline source | Publisher (no WeSearch rewrite) |
| Excerpt source | publisher body |
| Excerpt method | First ~120 words (~800 chars) of extracted publisher body, fair-use limited. |
| Summary | WeSearch · cerebras-chat (WeSearch summarizer) |
| Summary source text | contentText |
| Citation coverage | Summary is a WeSearch-generated derivative; primary citation is the original publisher URL. |
| Cluster | dYLaDqQconWp |
| Cluster logic | Grouped by semantic title/content similarity across sources within a rolling window. Same-publisher template collisions are excluded from coverage comparison. |
| Ranking reason | Story pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking. |
| Publisher visit | Yes — open original |
| Substitutes article? | No — link-out required for full text |
Rights status (four layers)
WeSearch handling by dimension
| Indexing | May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)? | Allowed |
| Snippet | May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown? | Allowed |
| AI summary | May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article? | Limited |
| Retrieval / RAG | May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation? | Not asserted |
| Model training | May the content be used to train AI models? | Not asserted |
| Commercial reuse | May the content be reused commercially? | Not permitted |
Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
try { if(localStorage) { let currentUser = localStorage.getItem('current_user'); if (currentUser) { currentUser = JSON.parse(currentUser); if (currentUser.id === 3820775) { document.getElementById('article-show-container').classList.add('current-user-is-article-author'); } } } } catch (e) { console.error(e); } Dmitry (Dee) Kargaev Posted on May 20 • Originally published at blog.deeflect.com The AI visibility checklist I used on my own agency site #w21 #geo #checklist #anchor A few weeks ago I asked an answer engine to recommend an AI-visibility consultant. The first five results were a wall of slop. Three were SEO agencies that had rewritten their homepage with the word "GEO" stapled to it. One was a Medium post by someone who clearly had not shipped anything. One was a course.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at DEV.to (Top).