The Core Ultra 7 270K was too good, so Intel scrapped the flagship Core Ultra 9 290K Plus — benchmarks of the 290K prototype find slim 2% faster performance in gaming and applications
Intel canceled the Core Ultra 9 290K Plus despite its development and prototype testing. Benchmarks of the engineering sample show only a 2% performance improvement over the Core Ultra 7 270K in gaming and applications. The minimal gains likely made the flagship CPU unjustifiable for release.
- ▪The Core Ultra 9 290K Plus was based on the 285K with a 24-core configuration and DDR5-7200 support.
- ▪In synthetic benchmarks, the 290K Plus averaged only 1.5% higher performance than the 270K Plus.
- ▪In gaming, the 290K Plus showed an average 2% FPS improvement at 1080p and just 1.5% at 1440p compared to the 270K Plus.
- ▪The 290K Plus was 9.3% faster than AMD's Ryzen 9 9950X3D2 in Ansys Fluent Simulation but lagged behind overall in productivity tasks.
Tom's Hardware files mainly under tech. We currently carry 430 of its stories.
Story provenance
Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record
inspect →
Story provenance
Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.
Record
| Original publisher | Tom's Hardware |
| Canonical URL | https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/cpus/the-core-ultra-7-270k-was-too-good-so-intel-scrapped-the-flagship-core-ultra-9-290k-plus-benchmarks-of-the-290k-prototype-find-slim-2-percent-faster-performance-in-gaming-and-applications |
| Publication time | Sat, 16 May 2026 15:06:54 +0000 |
| Retrieval time | 2026-05-16T15:10:19.235Z |
| Last seen | 2026-05-16T15:10:19.235Z |
| Headline source | Publisher (no WeSearch rewrite) |
| Excerpt source | publisher body |
| Excerpt method | First ~120 words (~800 chars) of extracted publisher body, fair-use limited. |
| Summary | WeSearch · cerebras-chat (WeSearch summarizer) |
| Summary source text | contentText |
| Citation coverage | Summary is a WeSearch-generated derivative; primary citation is the original publisher URL. |
| Cluster | ADJKtyHqP239 |
| Cluster logic | Grouped by semantic title/content similarity across sources within a rolling window. Same-publisher template collisions are excluded from coverage comparison. |
| Ranking reason | Story pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking. |
| Publisher visit | Yes — open original |
| Substitutes article? | No — link-out required for full text |
Rights status (four layers)
WeSearch handling by dimension
| Indexing | May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)? | Allowed |
| Snippet | May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown? | Allowed |
| AI summary | May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article? | Limited |
| Retrieval / RAG | May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation? | Not asserted |
| Model training | May the content be used to train AI models? | Not asserted |
| Commercial reuse | May the content be reused commercially? | Not permitted |
Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
PC Components CPUs The Core Ultra 7 270K was too good, so Intel scrapped the flagship Core Ultra 9 290K Plus — benchmarks of the 290K prototype find slim 2% faster performance in gaming and applications News By Hassam Nasir published 16 May 2026 The Core Ultra 9 290K Plus just wouldn't have made sense. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Here’s how it works. (Image credit: Intel) Share Copy link Facebook X Whatsapp Reddit Pinterest Flipboard Email Share this article Join the conversation Follow us Add us as a preferred source on Google Newsletter Subscribe to our newsletter Intel canned the Core Ultra 9 290K Plus from the Arrow Lake refresh lineup announced a few months ago, despite a swirling of leaks and rumors confirming its existence.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at Tom's Hardware.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from Tom's Hardware
