The Fonts of the U.S. Federal Courts
The U.S. federal courts of appeals have varying typographic styles, with most using Times New Roman. The Fifth Circuit recently upgraded to the Equity font, which has been praised for its legibility and aesthetics. The Supreme Court maintains a consistent use of Century Schoolbook, reflecting a long-standing tradition in its document formatting.
- ▪The Ninth Circuit uses Times New Roman for its decisions, while the First and Fourth Circuits use Courier New.
- ▪The Fifth Circuit switched from Century Schoolbook to Equity in 2020, which has been positively received.
- ▪The U.S. Supreme Court requires submissions to be typeset in a Century family font, maintaining a consistent style for over a century.
Hacker News (Newest) files mainly under programming. We currently carry 5,306 of its stories.
Story provenance
Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record
inspect →
Story provenance
Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.
Record
| Original publisher | Daring Fireball |
| Canonical URL | https://daringfireball.net/2026/05/the_fonts_of_the_us_federal_courts |
| Publication time | Sat, 23 May 2026 05:12:45 +0000 |
| Retrieval time | 2026-05-23T05:37:24.912Z |
| Last seen | 2026-05-23T05:37:24.912Z |
| Headline source | Publisher (no WeSearch rewrite) |
| Excerpt source | publisher body |
| Excerpt method | First ~120 words (~800 chars) of extracted publisher body, fair-use limited. |
| Summary | WeSearch · cerebras-chat (WeSearch summarizer) |
| Summary source text | contentText |
| Citation coverage | Summary is a WeSearch-generated derivative; primary citation is the original publisher URL. |
| Cluster | j1tK0rVCqo0K |
| Cluster logic | Grouped by semantic title/content similarity across sources within a rolling window. Same-publisher template collisions are excluded from coverage comparison. |
| Ranking reason | Story pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking. |
| Publisher visit | Yes — open original |
| Substitutes article? | No — link-out required for full text |
Rights status (four layers)
WeSearch handling by dimension
| Indexing | May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)? | Allowed |
| Snippet | May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown? | Allowed |
| AI summary | May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article? | Limited |
| Retrieval / RAG | May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation? | Not asserted |
| Model training | May the content be used to train AI models? | Not asserted |
| Commercial reuse | May the content be reused commercially? | Not permitted |
Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
The Fonts of the U.S. Federal Courts Friday, 22 May 2026 The 13 circuits of the U.S. federal courts of appeals operate with a fair amount of independence, including their typographic choices. I was reminded of this today while reading the aforelinked decision from the Ninth Circuit in Epic v. Apple, because the Ninth Circuit sets their decisions in Times New Roman — a font that came up back in December in the context of the Trump State Department. Long argument short, Times New Roman isn’t bad, but it isn’t good. It is the median choice. But most of the circuit courts use it: the Third, Sixth, Eighth, Ninth, Tenth, and Eleventh.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at Daring Fireball.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from Daring Fireball
