The Make.com Modules I Actually Use Every Week (And The Ones I Killed)
The article discusses the author's experience with Make.com and the modules he finds essential for his weekly tasks. After auditing his setup, he identified which modules were beneficial and which were unnecessary complexities. He emphasizes the importance of simplicity and functionality in his automation processes.
- ▪The author uses Make.com for various projects, including client work and personal experiments.
- ▪He conducted a thorough audit of his Make scenarios to determine which modules were truly useful.
- ▪Modules that automate recurring tasks, provide actionable information quickly, and are easy to debug were prioritized.
DEV.to (Top) files mainly under programming. We currently carry 4,924 of its stories.
Story provenance
Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record
inspect →
Story provenance
Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.
Record
| Original publisher | DEV.to (Top) |
| Canonical URL | https://dev.to/richardlemon/the-makecom-modules-i-actually-use-every-week-and-the-ones-i-killed-4j62 |
| Publication time | Sat, 23 May 2026 22:00:00 +0000 |
| Retrieval time | 2026-05-23T22:07:28.048Z |
| Last seen | 2026-05-23T22:07:28.048Z |
| Headline source | Publisher (no WeSearch rewrite) |
| Excerpt source | publisher body |
| Excerpt method | First ~120 words (~800 chars) of extracted publisher body, fair-use limited. |
| Summary | WeSearch · cerebras-chat (WeSearch summarizer) |
| Summary source text | contentText |
| Citation coverage | Summary is a WeSearch-generated derivative; primary citation is the original publisher URL. |
| Cluster | ds1jFWuPY3dZ |
| Cluster logic | Grouped by semantic title/content similarity across sources within a rolling window. Same-publisher template collisions are excluded from coverage comparison. |
| Ranking reason | Story pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking. |
| Publisher visit | Yes — open original |
| Substitutes article? | No — link-out required for full text |
Rights status (four layers)
WeSearch handling by dimension
| Indexing | May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)? | Allowed |
| Snippet | May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown? | Allowed |
| AI summary | May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article? | Limited |
| Retrieval / RAG | May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation? | Not asserted |
| Model training | May the content be used to train AI models? | Not asserted |
| Commercial reuse | May the content be reused commercially? | Not permitted |
Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
try { if(localStorage) { let currentUser = localStorage.getItem('current_user'); if (currentUser) { currentUser = JSON.parse(currentUser); if (currentUser.id === 3798270) { document.getElementById('article-show-container').classList.add('current-user-is-article-author'); } } } } catch (e) { console.error(e); } Richard Lemon Posted on May 23 • Originally published at richardlemon.com The Make.com Modules I Actually Use Every Week (And The Ones I Killed) #nocode #automation #tooling #productivity The problem with my Make.com setup I use Make.com a lot. Client work, my own projects, experiments, tracking weird biohacking data, even baseball stuff. It started simple. Then, like every tool I enjoy, it turned into a zoo. Too many scenarios. Too many modules.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at DEV.to (Top).
Discussion
0 commentsMore from DEV.to (Top)
