Tools and skills for humans and agents to review via Magnifica Humanitas
The article discusses the Magnifica Humanitas framework, which emphasizes the importance of human dignity and shared responsibility in the context of AI. It provides tools and skills for individuals and agents to review various projects, policies, and ideas through this humanistic lens. The framework encourages critical questions about the impact of AI on humanity and the common good.
- ▪Magnifica Humanitas focuses on human dignity and shared responsibility in AI.
- ▪Users can review projects, policies, and ideas using provided tools and templates.
- ▪The framework encourages critical evaluation of AI's impact on society.
Hacker News (Newest) files mainly under programming. We currently carry 5,306 of its stories.
Story provenance
Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record
inspect →
Story provenance
Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.
Record
| Original publisher | Encyclical |
| Canonical URL | https://encyclical.ai/ |
| Publication time | Tue, 26 May 2026 10:21:33 +0000 |
| Retrieval time | 2026-05-26T10:37:48.036Z |
| Last seen | 2026-05-26T10:37:48.036Z |
| Headline source | Publisher (no WeSearch rewrite) |
| Excerpt source | publisher body |
| Excerpt method | First ~120 words (~800 chars) of extracted publisher body, fair-use limited. |
| Summary | WeSearch · cerebras-chat (WeSearch summarizer) |
| Summary source text | contentText |
| Citation coverage | Summary is a WeSearch-generated derivative; primary citation is the original publisher URL. |
| Cluster | cNjo7FA0k9s_ |
| Cluster logic | Grouped by semantic title/content similarity across sources within a rolling window. Same-publisher template collisions are excluded from coverage comparison. |
| Ranking reason | Story pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking. |
| Publisher visit | Yes — open original |
| Substitutes article? | No — link-out required for full text |
Rights status (four layers)
WeSearch handling by dimension
| Indexing | May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)? | Allowed |
| Snippet | May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown? | Allowed |
| AI summary | May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article? | Limited |
| Retrieval / RAG | May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation? | Not asserted |
| Model training | May the content be used to train AI models? | Not asserted |
| Commercial reuse | May the content be reused commercially? | Not permitted |
Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
01 Magnifica Humanitas review Use AI.Remain Human. Tools and skills for humans and agents to review things through the frame of the Magnifica Humanitas. View repo Review skill Start a review Review frame Babel Jerusalem Dignity person over profile Truth evidence over persuasion Power shared responsibility 02 How to use Read. Review. Request. Read the Magnifica Humanitas Encyclical. Review something using the Markdown document or by creating an issue from the template. Ask an agent to review something: Copy prompt Use https://github.com/mrjf/encyclical/blob/main/magnifica-humanitas-review/SKILL.md to help me review ... Copy Request an agent review. 03 What is it good for What should I review? Projects that use AI, certainly, but also... anything you want.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at Encyclical.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from Encyclical
