WeSearch

Welcome to Order by Jungle

Radim Marek· ·11 min read · 0 reactions · 0 comments · 38 views
Welcome to Order by Jungle
TL;DR · WeSearch summary

The article discusses the complexities of the SQL ORDER BY clause, highlighting how it processes identifiers and expressions differently. It explains that while most developers assume ORDER BY simply sorts by column names, there are nuances that can lead to unexpected results. The author provides examples to illustrate how aliases and expressions interact within the SQL parser, revealing potential pitfalls in query design.

Key facts
About this source

Hacker News (Newest) files mainly under programming. We currently carry 5,306 of its stories.

Original article
boringSQL | Supercharge your SQL & PostgreSQL powers · Radim Marek
Read full at boringSQL | Supercharge your SQL & PostgreSQL powers →

Story provenance

Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record
inspect →

Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.

Record

Original publisherboringSQL | Supercharge your SQL & PostgreSQL powers
Canonical URLhttps://boringsql.com/posts/order-by-jungle/
Publication timeTue, 19 May 2026 10:47:09 +0000
Retrieval time2026-05-19T11:04:57.554Z
Last seen2026-05-19T11:04:57.554Z
Headline sourcePublisher (no WeSearch rewrite)
Excerpt sourcepublisher body
Excerpt methodFirst ~120 words (~800 chars) of extracted publisher body, fair-use limited.
SummaryWeSearch · cerebras-chat (WeSearch summarizer)
Summary source textcontentText
Citation coverageSummary is a WeSearch-generated derivative; primary citation is the original publisher URL.
ClusterVvth0EEmVfTf
Cluster logicGrouped by semantic title/content similarity across sources within a rolling window. Same-publisher template collisions are excluded from coverage comparison.
Ranking reasonStory pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking.
Publisher visitYes — open original
Substitutes article?No — link-out required for full text

Rights status (four layers)

Publisher-declared
No publisher-confirmed rights record for this source yet.
Machine-readable
No source-specific machine-readable restriction detected beyond the public feed.
WeSearch interpretation
WeSearch declared handling (basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed). This is WeSearch policy, not a legal grant on the publisher's behalf.
Unknown
Retrieval and training permissions are not asserted unless the publisher confirms them.

WeSearch handling by dimension

Indexing May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)? Allowed
Snippet May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown? Allowed
AI summary May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article? Limited
Retrieval / RAG May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation? Not asserted
Model training May the content be used to train AI models? Not asserted
Commercial reuse May the content be reused commercially? Not permitted

Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.

Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand

Table of Contents Names and expressions are not the same Same answer, two different sorts Above the identifier, or around it Aliases that aren't the names you think GROUP BY checks the opposite scope first Window ORDER BY does not even pretend UNION ORDER BY is name-only The seam, in the source A useful workaround The boring takeaway SQL is fun and not at all boring. The latest article by Markus Winand on Order by Has Come a Long Way sent me on quite a journey. First, set up a table called nums with one integer column and four rows: CREATE TABLE nums (a int); INSERT INTO nums VALUES (0), (1), (2), (3); Try to guess what these two queries return. SELECT -a AS a FROM nums ORDER BY a; SELECT -a AS a FROM nums ORDER BY -a; Most of us would guess the same rows in a different order.

Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at boringSQL | Supercharge your SQL & PostgreSQL powers.

Anonymous · no account needed
Share 𝕏 Facebook Reddit LinkedIn Threads WhatsApp Bluesky Mastodon Email

Discussion

0 comments