You Live in an Illusion. Get over It
The article discusses the resistance of senior developers to AI-generated code, highlighting a historical pattern of reluctance towards new abstraction layers in programming. It argues that developers often operate under an illusion of understanding, believing they comprehend the code they work with, when in reality they rely on stable abstractions. The author suggests that this transition to AI-generated code is another step in the evolution of programming, where control can shift to new layers without losing essential functionality.
- ▪Senior engineers are hesitant to adopt AI-generated code due to a perceived lack of understanding.
- ▪Historically, developers have resisted new abstraction layers, only to later accept them as standard.
- ▪The article references a paper that discusses the illusion of understanding in scientific work, which parallels the experiences of developers.
Hacker News (Newest) files mainly under programming. We currently carry 5,306 of its stories.
Story provenance
Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record
inspect →
Story provenance
Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.
Record
| Original publisher | Amazing CTO |
| Canonical URL | https://www.amazingcto.com/ai-the-next-absorption-event/ |
| Publication time | Tue, 26 May 2026 12:57:51 +0000 |
| Retrieval time | 2026-05-26T13:07:49.469Z |
| Last seen | 2026-05-26T13:07:49.469Z |
| Headline source | Publisher (no WeSearch rewrite) |
| Excerpt source | publisher body |
| Excerpt method | First ~120 words (~800 chars) of extracted publisher body, fair-use limited. |
| Summary | WeSearch · cerebras-chat (WeSearch summarizer) |
| Summary source text | contentText |
| Citation coverage | Summary is a WeSearch-generated derivative; primary citation is the original publisher URL. |
| Cluster | None |
| Cluster logic | Not yet clustered, or no peer story found in the clustering window. |
| Ranking reason | Story pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking. |
| Publisher visit | Yes — open original |
| Substitutes article? | No — link-out required for full text |
Rights status (four layers)
WeSearch handling by dimension
| Indexing | May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)? | Allowed |
| Snippet | May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown? | Allowed |
| AI summary | May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article? | Limited |
| Retrieval / RAG | May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation? | Not asserted |
| Model training | May the content be used to train AI models? | Not asserted |
| Commercial reuse | May the content be reused commercially? | Not permitted |
Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
CTO Coaching CTO CoachingStephan Schmidt - May 26, 2026You Already Live in an Illusion. Get Over It.AI is the next absorption event, and the thing being absorbed is codeTL;DR: Senior engineers refuse AI-generated code because they cannot ship code they do not understand. But they never understood the code -- not the bytecode, not the query planner, not the SIMD instruction the compiler folds their loop into. They trusted stable abstractions, not understanding. Every layer of our stack absorbed the one below it: assembly into C, malloc into garbage collection, threads into async runtimes. AI codegen is the next absorption event, and code is the thing being absorbed. The failure modes that look catastrophic today will stabilize the way GC pauses did.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at Amazing CTO.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from Amazing CTO
