Court rejects Apple’s attempt to postpone App Store fee proceedings in Epic Games case
A court has rejected Apple's attempt to postpone App Store fee proceedings in the Epic Games case. The decision means Apple now has 24 hours to file its proposed fee and supporting evidence. The case is part of an ongoing lawsuit between Epic Games and Apple over App Store fees and payment methods.
- ▪Apple had requested to pause the proceedings pending the Supreme Court's review of the company's contempt ruling.
- ▪Epic Games argued that the proceedings should move forward regardless of the Supreme Court's review.
- ▪Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers denied Apple's request, giving the company 24 hours to file its proposed fee and evidence.
9to5Mac files mainly under tech. We currently carry 654 of its stories.
Story provenance
Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record
inspect →
Story provenance
Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.
Record
| Original publisher | 9to5Mac |
| Canonical URL | https://9to5mac.com/2026/08/11/court-rejects-apples-attempt-to-postpone-app-store-fee-proceedings-in-epic-games-case/ |
| Publication time | Tue, 11 Aug 2026 19:59:40 +0000 |
| Retrieval time | 2026-08-11T20:00:48.204Z |
| Last seen | 2026-08-11T20:00:48.204Z |
| Headline source | Publisher (no WeSearch rewrite) |
| Excerpt source | publisher body |
| Excerpt method | First ~120 words (~800 chars) of extracted publisher body, fair-use limited. |
| Summary | WeSearch · cerebras-chat (WeSearch summarizer) |
| Summary source text | contentText |
| Citation coverage | Summary is a WeSearch-generated derivative; primary citation is the original publisher URL. |
| Cluster | LliZZswbs7uV · 1 stories |
| Cluster logic | Grouped by semantic title/content similarity across sources within a rolling window. Same-publisher template collisions are excluded from coverage comparison. |
| Ranking reason | Story pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking. |
| Publisher visit | Yes — open original |
| Substitutes article? | No — link-out required for full text |
Rights status (four layers)
WeSearch handling by dimension
| Indexing | May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)? | Allowed |
| Snippet | May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown? | Allowed |
| AI summary | May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article? | Limited |
| Retrieval / RAG | May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation? | Not asserted |
| Model training | May the content be used to train AI models? | Not asserted |
| Commercial reuse | May the content be reused commercially? | Not permitted |
Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
// Make sure that nineto5ads exists, it will load ad once google tag exists window.nineto5ads = window.nineto5ads|| []; if (typeof adSizes === 'undefined') { var adSizes = {"leaderboard":{"mobile":[[320,50],[320,100]],"tablet":[[728,90],[320,100]],"desktop":[[970,250],[728,90],[970,70],[970,90]]},"sidebar":{"mobile":[300,250],"desktop":[[300,600],[300,250]]}}; } function getLeaderboardApstagSlotsSizes() { if ( window.innerWidth < 768 ) { return adSizes.leaderboard.mobile; } else if ( window.innerWidth < 1024 ) { return adSizes.leaderboard.tablet; } else { return adSizes.leaderboard.desktop; } } window.nineto5ads.push(function() { apstag.fetchBids({ slots: [{ slotID: "div-gpt-ad-1436850350386-0", slotName: "\/1049447\/9to5mac-Top", sizes: getLeaderboardApstagSlotsSizes() }], timeout: 2e3…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at 9to5Mac.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from 9to5Mac
