Jaron Lanier: there is no AI (2023)
Jaron Lanier argues that the term “artificial intelligence” is misleading and that current technologies function more as collaborative tools than independent intelligences. He warns that mythologizing AI can impede effective management and increase the risk of harmful outcomes. Lanier suggests viewing systems like GPT‑4 as advanced statistical mashups of human‑generated content, akin to an enhanced form of social collaboration.
- ▪Lanier dislikes the term “AI,” calling it a dangerous mythologization of the technology.
- ▪A recent poll indicated that half of AI researchers believe there is at least a ten‑percent chance of human extinction due to AI.
- ▪He describes GPT‑4 as a statistical mashup of human‑written text, comparable to an expanded version of Wikipedia.
- ▪Lanier emphasizes that treating AI as a tool rather than a creature can improve governance and reduce existential risk.
Hacker News (AI / LLM) files mainly under ai. We currently carry 3,275 of its stories.
Story provenance
Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record
inspect →
Story provenance
Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.
Record
| Original publisher | The New Yorker |
| Canonical URL | https://www.newyorker.com/science/annals-of-artificial-intelligence/there-is-no-ai |
| Publication time | Mon, 20 Jul 2026 15:28:32 +0000 |
| Retrieval time | 2026-07-20T15:53:38.959Z |
| Last seen | 2026-07-20T15:53:38.959Z |
| Headline source | Publisher (no WeSearch rewrite) |
| Excerpt source | publisher body |
| Excerpt method | First ~120 words (~800 chars) of extracted publisher body, fair-use limited. |
| Summary | WeSearch · cerebras-chat (WeSearch summarizer) |
| Summary source text | contentText |
| Citation coverage | Summary is a WeSearch-generated derivative; primary citation is the original publisher URL. |
| Cluster | joiUhKaKSIL1 |
| Cluster logic | Grouped by semantic title/content similarity across sources within a rolling window. Same-publisher template collisions are excluded from coverage comparison. |
| Ranking reason | Story pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking. |
| Publisher visit | Yes — open original |
| Substitutes article? | No — link-out required for full text |
Rights status (four layers)
WeSearch handling by dimension
| Indexing | May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)? | Allowed |
| Snippet | May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown? | Allowed |
| AI summary | May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article? | Limited |
| Retrieval / RAG | May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation? | Not asserted |
| Model training | May the content be used to train AI models? | Not asserted |
| Commercial reuse | May the content be reused commercially? | Not permitted |
Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
Annals of Artificial IntelligenceThere Is No A.I.There are ways of controlling the new technology—but first we have to stop mythologizing it.By Jaron LanierApril 20, 2023Illustration by Nicholas Konrad / The New YorkerSave this storySave this storySave this storySave this storyAs a computer scientist, I don’t like the term “A.I.” In fact, I think it’s misleading—maybe even a little dangerous. Everybody’s already using the term, and it might seem a little late in the day to be arguing about it. But we’re at the beginning of a new technological era—and the easiest way to mismanage a technology is to misunderstand it.The term “artificial intelligence” has a long history—it was coined in the nineteen-fifties, in the early days of computers.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at The New Yorker.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from The New Yorker
